Athenians believed democracy could easily be threatened due to the potential for tyranny and mob rule, where passionate citizens could sway public opinion and decisions. The experience of past oligarchic coups made them wary of any concentration of power. Additionally, the reliance on public assemblies and direct participation meant that uninformed or emotional decisions could undermine rational governance. Consequently, they sought safeguards like ostracism to mitigate these threats and protect their democratic system.
Athenians were known for their emphasis on democracy, philosophy, and the arts, which made Athens a cultural and intellectual hub of ancient Greece. They valued education and debate, fostering a society where citizens could engage in political discourse and civic duties. Additionally, Athenians were proud of their naval prowess and trade, contributing to their economic strength and influence in the region. Their commitment to civic life and innovation shaped much of Western civilization's foundations.
The answer they are looking for is democracy. After the reforms of Solon, all male landowners of property gained the vote, and any such man could be elected into office, women, slaves, and xenoi (resident foreigners, Greeks, but not Athenians) could not vote. Practically everything was decided by some form of election, and it has been estimated that every male landowner in Athens will have served in the administration at some point in his life.
The main criticism of ancient Athenian democracy is the limitations Athenian law placed upon who could be considered a citizen. The only Athenians who were considered full citizens were Athens-born men of at least 18 years of age. And to be considered Athens-born, both of one's parents had to have been citizens. But while women could be considered citizens, they had no voice in the Assembly, and no real rights within the democracy. Furthermore, slaves had no voice whatsoever in the Athenian democracy.
The Athenians practiced ostracism as a political tool to protect their democracy from potential tyrants or overly powerful individuals who could threaten the city's stability. This process allowed citizens to vote to exile a person for ten years, thereby reducing the risk of tyranny and factionalism. Ostracism served as a means of maintaining balance within the political system and ensuring that no single individual could dominate Athenian politics. It reflected the democratic values of the city, emphasizing collective decision-making and the importance of individual accountability.
Both of them could be in the Olympics and Sparta tried to win over Athenians all the time
The Athenians developed a Democracy where only certain classes of people could vote.
Walt Whitman could easily be said to both an nonconformist and a poet that celebrated American democracy.
A democracy is one, there may be others. Electing officials could as easily be applied to a socialist regime.
Pericles changed the Athenian society by proposing a new type of government to take effect. He wanted to start a democracy where all male Athenians could be involved with governmental decisions.
Athenians were known for their emphasis on democracy, philosophy, and the arts, which made Athens a cultural and intellectual hub of ancient Greece. They valued education and debate, fostering a society where citizens could engage in political discourse and civic duties. Additionally, Athenians were proud of their naval prowess and trade, contributing to their economic strength and influence in the region. Their commitment to civic life and innovation shaped much of Western civilization's foundations.
The answer they are looking for is democracy. After the reforms of Solon, all male landowners of property gained the vote, and any such man could be elected into office, women, slaves, and xenoi (resident foreigners, Greeks, but not Athenians) could not vote. Practically everything was decided by some form of election, and it has been estimated that every male landowner in Athens will have served in the administration at some point in his life.
No
Socrates was critical of democracy because he believed that it could be easily manipulated by demagogues and lead to unjust decision-making. He was also concerned about the influence of majority opinion over truth and reason.
The main criticism of ancient Athenian democracy is the limitations Athenian law placed upon who could be considered a citizen. The only Athenians who were considered full citizens were Athens-born men of at least 18 years of age. And to be considered Athens-born, both of one's parents had to have been citizens. But while women could be considered citizens, they had no voice in the Assembly, and no real rights within the democracy. Furthermore, slaves had no voice whatsoever in the Athenian democracy.
I dont really know, but you could call the dictionary for help! =)
Who wouldn't want democracy if they could have it?
Plato rejects democracy because he believed that it was an unstable form of government that could easily lead to tyranny. He argued that democracy could be manipulated by demagogues who appeal to the emotions of the people rather than reason, resulting in a society ruled by unqualified leaders. Plato believed that a philosopher-king, guided by wisdom and reason, was the ideal ruler for a just and harmonious society.