answersLogoWhite

0

The people of Salem had no explanation for what ailed the afflicted and were afraid of it. Blaming witches and attempting to get rid of those witches was one of the only things they could do. Also, at the time, religion played a part in the law and government, so it would be simple to try them for witchcraft, that was actually a felony.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What was revealed during the trials of Nazi war criminals that eventually aided Israel?

The Atrocities of the Holocaust that were elaborated on during the Nazi Trials became irrefutable evidence that the Jews needed a country of their own. This allowed Zionists to convince numerous people around the world of the necessity of Israel, eventually resulting in Israeli Independence.


What situation was a direct result of the Holocaust and other atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War 2?

a divided Germany.


What do you call a person who takes part in the holocaust?

A person who takes part in the Holocaust is commonly referred to as a perpetrator or collaborator. These terms indicate their active involvement in the atrocities committed during that time.


What does sporting mean in the Salem witch trials?

During the era the trials occurred during, sporting was used to mean fun. In reference to the trials, it was used by the opponents of the trials to express the possiblity that bored girls were lying about afflictions to have fun.


What are some examples of cruelty by the NVA in the Vietnam Conflict?

Although there were atrocities committed by both sides during the Vietnam War, they were by no means restricted to the Viet War. Nearly all wars consist of "cruelties" committed by combatants. The NVA, like the US Army were regular uniformed soldiers and very rarely committed atrocities, at any rate, not more than the allied forces. The VC, being (non-uniformed) guerrillas, were the notorious units held responsible for the vast majority of "cruelties." As happened in the US Civil War (involving guerrillas), men were sometimes tied to a tree, sometimes partially skinned, beheaded, etc. These are not accepted rules "of war" and often times result in criminal war trials once the conflict has ended.

Related Questions

What was the Nuremberg trails?

they were the Nuremberg Trials, to try the Nazi criminals who committed murder during the WW ll atrocities against the Jewish people.


Atrocities used in a sentence?

it is well known that atrocities were committed during the war


What the outcome of the Nuremberg Trials?

The Nuremberg Trials resulted in the conviction of top Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other atrocities committed during World War II. The trials established the principles of individual accountability for committing atrocities under international law and laid the foundation for future prosecutions of war crimes.


Which situation was a direct result of the Holocaust and other atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War 2?

The Frankfurt war crimes trials, the UN charter on human rights.


What city in Germany were German criminals tried for atrocities during world war 2?

German war criminals were tried for atrocities during World War II in the city of Nuremberg. The Nuremberg Trials took place from 1945 to 1946 and aimed to hold individuals accountable for their roles in war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other atrocities committed during the war.


How did the Nuremberg trials end?

The Nuremberg trials ended with the sentencing of top Nazi officials for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide committed during World War II. Twelve defendants received the death penalty, three were acquitted, and others received various prison sentences. The trials set a precedent in international law for prosecuting individuals responsible for atrocities committed during times of conflict.


What crimes were the defendants accused of at the Nuremberg Trials?

The defendants at the Nuremberg Trials were accused of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. These included atrocities such as genocide, mass murder, torture, and enslavement committed during World War II.


What is a good thesis statement for the Nuremberg trials?

A good thesis statement for the Nuremberg trials could be: "The Nuremberg trials represented a significant moment in international law by establishing the principle of individual accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity, setting a precedent for future trials of those responsible for atrocities committed during times of conflict."


What was the importance of the Nuremberg trials?

The Nuremberg trials were crucial in establishing legal precedents for prosecuting individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. These trials helped bring Nazi war criminals to justice and aimed to ensure accountability for their actions during World War II. Additionally, the trials highlighted the importance of international cooperation and the rule of law in addressing atrocities committed during times of conflict.


What major atrocities were committed during the American Revolutionary War?

Tarletons Quarter


How did Winston Churchill want to deal with defendants of Nuremberg trials?

Winston Churchill wanted the defendants of the Nuremberg trials to be executed without a trial or due process. He believed that those responsible for the atrocities committed during World War II deserved the ultimate punishment without delay.


Why were the Nuremberg Trials held after World War 2?

The Nuremberg Trials were held after World War II to bring Nazi war criminals to justice for their roles in the Holocaust and other atrocities committed during the war. These trials aimed to establish a legal precedent for prosecuting crimes against humanity and to hold individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their rank or position. By doing so, the trials sought to promote accountability, deter future atrocities, and reaffirm the principle that individuals can be held responsible under international law.