Some Americans opposed U.S. expansion due to concerns about the moral implications of Imperialism, fearing it would contradict the nation's founding principles of democracy and self-determination. Others worried about the potential for increased conflict with indigenous populations and foreign nations. Additionally, there were economic apprehensions regarding the costs of maintaining and governing new territories, as well as concerns about the impact on the labor market and social dynamics in existing states.
Many Americans may oppose the U.S. control of more land due to concerns over sovereignty, environmental impact, and potential conflict with local populations. They may fear that expansion could lead to military overreach or imperialism, undermining democratic values. Additionally, issues related to indigenous rights and the preservation of natural resources often fuel opposition to further territorial acquisition. Overall, there is a desire to prioritize diplomacy and cooperation over territorial expansion.
they feared that US expansion would lead it to become an empire. They didnt like that idea because they pictured empires as a threat to individual freedoms, something they inherited from the american revolution.
they believed the colonies were not worth american time and money
There was no opposition to the westward expansion of the US. The first available westward movement came with the Treaty of Paris, where England gave to the 13 colonies all land east of the Mississippi River. Also, the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 set the groundwork for westward expansion.
Because it was seen as favoring slavery.
They believed that expansion went against American ideals.
the answer is a. Its expansion in Asia
Generally speaking, the Left-wing in the US tends to oppose participation in wars.
Many Americans may oppose the U.S. control of more land due to concerns over sovereignty, environmental impact, and potential conflict with local populations. They may fear that expansion could lead to military overreach or imperialism, undermining democratic values. Additionally, issues related to indigenous rights and the preservation of natural resources often fuel opposition to further territorial acquisition. Overall, there is a desire to prioritize diplomacy and cooperation over territorial expansion.
They believed that expansion went against american ideals
they feared that US expansion would lead it to become an empire. They didnt like that idea because they pictured empires as a threat to individual freedoms, something they inherited from the american revolution.
The Irish-Americans possibly did not like Great Britain
i dont know what happen
they believed the colonies were not worth american time and money
I would oppose such an amendment as a violation of states' rights as well as the civil rights of Americans.
Freed African Americans would take some of their jobs, the workers were socially higher than slaves, and disruption of the Union.
anti-federalists wrote the articles in 1787