The Native Americans often trusted the French more than the British due to differences in their approaches to trade and alliances. The French were more focused on establishing mutually beneficial trading relationships and often relied on Native American allies in their military campaigns. Additionally, the French tended to have a more respectful and cooperative attitude towards Native American cultures compared to the British, who often sought to control and exploit indigenous populations. These factors contributed to a greater sense of trust and partnership between Native Americans and the French.
The British weren't very close with the Indians, who played a very important role during the war. The french, however, had many Indian allies. but, England did gain the trust of the Iroquois. also, the french colonies were under one united government, as the British were broken into 13 separate governments. during the war, unity was key.
old answer: Spanish were mean to indians improved answer: A leading figure in France in the 1600's was Samuel de Champlain. He made friends with a nearby Huron Indian tribe. He granted their request to fight alongside them in a battle with their enemies, the Iroquois. The French recruited Indians to help with the fur business, which was actually a hardship for the Indians who were subjected to the colonist's diseases and asked to do things that were against their religious beliefs. But nevertheless, the French and these Indians remained partners. When the Spanish came to the Americas, they too interacted with the Indians. One of the biggest effects of the Spanish-Indian interaction was the introduction of the horse to the Indian people. This was one of the only positive impacts of the interaction of the Spanish and the Indians. The term the "Black Legend" was created after the Spanish invaders killed, enslaved, and infected natives with disease. This was a more accurate description of the relations between the Indians and Spanish. British relations to the Indians can be summed up with the Anglo-Powhatan Wars, when the Indians were brutally defeated.
Perhaps because the British had proven to be less than honorable in the past when it came to Indian treaties. For them the Indian belonged on the outer edge or deep in the North American heartland (At least west of the Mississippi River.) The French had ties through Indian brides which cemented closer unity.
this was because the Indians had no one else to trust so they turned to the Americans
Some of them sided with the French and some of them sided with the British. I believe more of them sided with the French because the French were not as interested in expanding and settling westward as the Bristish colonists were, and therefore encroached on fewer Native American tribes' lands. They were on good terms with those tribes for that reason. However, as a whole the Native Americans were divided amongst themselves as to which side they should support. The British had native allies, too.
The British weren't very close with the Indians, who played a very important role during the war. The french, however, had many Indian allies. but, England did gain the trust of the Iroquois. also, the french colonies were under one united government, as the British were broken into 13 separate governments. during the war, unity was key.
old answer: Spanish were mean to indians improved answer: A leading figure in France in the 1600's was Samuel de Champlain. He made friends with a nearby Huron Indian tribe. He granted their request to fight alongside them in a battle with their enemies, the Iroquois. The French recruited Indians to help with the fur business, which was actually a hardship for the Indians who were subjected to the colonist's diseases and asked to do things that were against their religious beliefs. But nevertheless, the French and these Indians remained partners. When the Spanish came to the Americas, they too interacted with the Indians. One of the biggest effects of the Spanish-Indian interaction was the introduction of the horse to the Indian people. This was one of the only positive impacts of the interaction of the Spanish and the Indians. The term the "Black Legend" was created after the Spanish invaders killed, enslaved, and infected natives with disease. This was a more accurate description of the relations between the Indians and Spanish. British relations to the Indians can be summed up with the Anglo-Powhatan Wars, when the Indians were brutally defeated.
Well, there are lots of reasons, but look at it first from their (Indians) point of view. They saw the colonists, the Americans, as invaders. Yes, some Indians and colonists co-existed peacefully, but not on the whole. The white man believed he was entitled to this land by Manifest Destiny, and thus the Indians were savages, below and beneath the white man. Who wouldn't want to fight against these people? They were trying to take their land, kill them, kill their way of life, of course they helped the British! The British (also white men) said they'd give the land back to the Indians if they won!
this was because the Indians had no one else to trust so they turned to the Americans
Perhaps because the British had proven to be less than honorable in the past when it came to Indian treaties. For them the Indian belonged on the outer edge or deep in the North American heartland (At least west of the Mississippi River.) The French had ties through Indian brides which cemented closer unity.
The British lost the support of the Indians of the Ohio Valley primarily due to their aggressive expansionist policies and failure to respect Native American land rights. After the French and Indian War, British settlers encroached on tribal territories, leading to increased tensions and conflicts. Additionally, the British government's indifference to Native American grievances and their alliances with rival tribes further alienated the Ohio Valley Indians, ultimately diminishing their support. This loss of trust and cooperation contributed to the eventual uprisings against British rule, such as Pontiac's Rebellion.
Some of them sided with the French and some of them sided with the British. I believe more of them sided with the French because the French were not as interested in expanding and settling westward as the Bristish colonists were, and therefore encroached on fewer Native American tribes' lands. They were on good terms with those tribes for that reason. However, as a whole the Native Americans were divided amongst themselves as to which side they should support. The British had native allies, too.
Trust is "la confiance" in French.
British Trust for Ornithology was created in 1932.
Prior to the war, the US was not involved in any military alliance treaties that competed against another (i.e. Triple Alliance and Triple Entente). Then when the war broke out, the US tried to remain neutral. However, constantly taunted by Germany and having its national security threatened, the US entered WWI in the last year. Here, although fighting alongside British and French troops, Americans were fighting under their own commanders and not under British or French ones. The Americans didn't trust British or French commanders because obviously their previous tactics had not worked as it resulted in bloodbath.
Some Native Americans trusted the French more than the English due to the French approach to trade and alliances, which often emphasized cooperation and mutual benefit. The French tended to engage in fur trading partnerships, respecting tribal sovereignty and customs, whereas the English were more focused on land acquisition and settlement, which often led to conflict. Additionally, the French were fewer in number and more willing to intermarry and integrate with Native communities, fostering stronger relationships. This contrast in colonial policies and practices contributed to the greater trust Native Americans placed in the French.
The white peoples government had betrayed the Indians too many times before and the Indians didnt want to trust them again