One of the most important points is to understand that many people fled to America to escape persecution and religious wars in Europe. The Founders very much kept this in mind while constructing the Constitution. They sought to prevent another series of massacres, religious wars, and feuds over papal control like the ones that dominated history from the beginning of the Early Middle Ages to the Thirty Years' War (roughly 700 years or so of death in the name of state-imposed religion and power struggles). Therefore, The Bill of Rights not only enforces guidelines for proper government behavior, it is a means for protecting minority rights from majority oppression, otherwise known as mob rule. For example, the First Amendment's Freedom of Religion is not only a freedom for one to worship as they choose, but it also protects their right not to worship at all, if that is their thing. So, the point being, there is to be no official religion that would relight nationalistic religious fever, and the witch hunts and chaos that often follows. The same applies for every other aspect of the Bill of Rights as well. I believed the Founding Fathers would have shuddered at the thought of having a government invade in a person's privacy and home without a justified reason for doing so (ahem, Patriot Act). Therefore, the minority's rights to liberty, in theory, should be protected from whatever majority is in charge of the government, or from the actual government itself.
The colonists weren't satisfied that the Constitution spelled out their rights as a citizen, hence the making of the Bill of Rights.
so that the anti-federalist would be okay with the constition
no
The constitution lacked a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms so antifederalists were afraid their freedom would be taken away.The Americans wanted their rights protected and they wanted a Bill Of Rights to ensure it was protected
article V of the constitution
In comparison to the United States Constitution, how difficult is it to amend State constitutions
amend
The Constitution.
The Anti-Federalists made a condition that they would only agree to the Constitution if there where a Bill of Rights. The Founding Fathers were men of their word and it was done.
Our founding fathers knew that the Constitution they created was not perfect, and that through time, might be changed for the better, or to accustom future generations.
It was difficult to amend.
No. It simply trampled the rights and protections guaranteed in the Constitution.
The constitution lacked a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms so antifederalists were afraid their freedom would be taken away.The Americans wanted their rights protected and they wanted a Bill Of Rights to ensure it was protected
It lacked a Bill of Rights. The constitution was for the people. As needs change the people needed rights to amend the Constitution.
They wanted the Constitution to be a "living document" that could adapt to and address issues of a changing nation.
Amend the constitution APEX
statarted a campain to amend the constitution with a bill of rights
The Supreme Court does not have the power to amend the Constitution. Only the process of constitutional amendment outlined in Article V of the Constitution can be used to amend the Constitution. The Court's role is to interpret the Constitution and its amendments, not to amend them.
Defendant's Pretrial Rights · Writ of habeas corpus (Article I, Section 9). · Prompt arraignment (Amend. VI). · Legal counsel (Amend. VIII). · To be informed of charges (Amend. VI). · To remain silent (Amend. V).
Amend the Constitution