Most kings did not maintain standing armies due to the high costs associated with salaries, supplies, and equipment, which could strain royal finances. Instead, they relied on feudal systems where local lords provided troops in times of war, allowing kings to mobilize forces without the burden of permanent military upkeep. Additionally, standing armies could pose a threat to a king's power, as they might become loyal to their commanders rather than the crown. This reliance on temporary forces ensured greater control and stability for the monarchy.
You cannot compare ancient armies to modern ones because food technology and transportation improvements have allowed for larger fielded and standing armies.The Roman army of the past would be very smallcomparedto the industrial global armiesof today or even the professional standing armies of the late colonial times.In Ancient times (before the middle ages) the Roman Empire did field some of the largest armies and had one of the largest standing military of its era.
There are no pyramids in the Valley of the Kings, so there aren't any standing. The Valley of the Kings is a mountain range that was used to create tombs within the mountain to hide the kings and queens. They used natural caves and expanded them into rooms and passageways.
No.
There were several dominant Roman armies in history. These Roman armies include the Romany Army of the Mid-Repubic, Imperial Roman Army, Middle Byzantine Army, and Komnenian Byzantine Army.
Kings were not normally elected in England in the 11th century. Those with the most influence, money or the most powerful army became king.
because reasons
You're most likely referring to a scepter.
Powerful African Armies Were Able To Keep The Europeans Out Of Most Of Africa For 400 Years
Powerful African Armies Were Able To Keep The Europeans Out Of Most Of Africa For 400 Years
You cannot compare ancient armies to modern ones because food technology and transportation improvements have allowed for larger fielded and standing armies.The Roman army of the past would be very smallcomparedto the industrial global armiesof today or even the professional standing armies of the late colonial times.In Ancient times (before the middle ages) the Roman Empire did field some of the largest armies and had one of the largest standing military of its era.
Powerful African Armies Were Able To Keep The Europeans Out Of Most Of Africa For 400 Years
There are no pyramids in the Valley of the Kings, so there aren't any standing. The Valley of the Kings is a mountain range that was used to create tombs within the mountain to hide the kings and queens. They used natural caves and expanded them into rooms and passageways.
Turkey was a player in the affairs of Europe for many years. In the 17th Century, the Turks were the only power related to Europe that had a standing army. The European nations raised armies when needed. They did not have a "regular" armed force for the most part.
The kings of Egypt have the most power in Egypt
No.
To have children who would be his heirs. Most kings want to keep their realm in the family, famously Henry VIII spent most of his reign trying to have sons to pass on his crown.
Eleanor had 3 sons. Two became kings and she was married to two kings. In her time she was one of the most powerful women and one of the few who were able to keep her own lands plus go on a crusade.