it caused major separation in society, and the lack of social mobility in one's life-time.
The examination system in Ancient China, known as the imperial examination, led to the establishment of a meritocratic bureaucracy, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to rise based on their knowledge and abilities rather than their social status. This system emphasized Confucian ideals, promoting education and scholarship as pathways to government service. Consequently, it contributed to social mobility and stability within the state, while also fostering a culture of learning and intellectualism. However, it also created intense competition and stress among candidates, leading to significant societal pressures.
Both countries operate under a caste system. The system in India was strict and prohibited other classes from interacting with each other while Chinaâ??s social system did not demonstrate a formal and strict social ladder.
The Chinese civil-service system provided a way of social mobility and also served as the model for civil-service systems in Asia and the Western world.
Ancient Egypt's social class structure was known as a hierarchy, often depicted as a pyramid. At the top was the pharaoh, considered a divine ruler, followed by nobles, priests, scribes, artisans, and farmers at the base. This system was based on factors such as wealth, occupation, and proximity to the pharaoh, with each class having distinct roles and responsibilities in society. Social mobility was limited, but individuals could rise through merit, particularly in roles like administration or military service.
Answer this question…It limited social mobility.
Yes! Trimalchio's story suggests social mobility. The system rewarded hard work, ambition and the accumulation of wealth, but there were limits.
lack of social mobility
Answer this question…It limited social mobility.
Geographical mobility refers to the ability or willingness to move from one location to another, while social mobility pertains to the movement of individuals or groups within a social hierarchy or class system. Geographical mobility is about physical relocation, whereas social mobility is about improvement or decline in social status relative to others.
In the caste system, social mobility is extremely limited as it is determined by birth and deeply ingrained social norms. In the class system, social mobility is relatively fluid, with individuals able to move up or down the social ladder based on factors like education, occupation, and wealth. In the meritocracy system, social mobility is based on merit and individual achievement, where those with skills and talents have the greatest opportunity to advance regardless of their background.
that has little to no social mobility
Social mobility in the feudal system was limited. Typically, individuals were born into a particular social class and had little opportunity to move between classes. However, in some cases, exceptional individuals could rise in status through military prowess or service to a lord.
In the traditional Indian caste system, social mobility was very limited and typically only allowed through marriage. However, with the abolition of untouchability and the establishment of affirmative action policies, there has been some improvement in social mobility in modern Indian society.
No, traditionally the caste system in India was designed to be a rigid social structure that did not allow for easy social mobility. Individuals were born into specific castes and generally remained in that caste for life, with limited opportunities to move between castes.
The caste system in India traditionally lacks social mobility, as individuals are born into a specific caste and are expected to adhere to its social roles and occupations. However, efforts are being made to promote social mobility and equality through affirmative action policies such as reservations in education and employment for historically disadvantaged castes. Despite these measures, social mobility remains limited for many lower caste individuals.
The existence or nonexistence of social mobility