cuz she aint wanna throw da neck
b.o.h
the supreme court.
#1 Superior Court #2 Superior Court #3 Superior Court #4 Superior Court ... #1 Supreme Court #2 Supreme Court #3 Supreme Court #4 Supreme Court ...
The Supreme Court was established in September 1789.
ALL lower courts, both state and federal, can be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Every court in the nation is subordinate to the US Supreme Court.
Supreme Court
it determined that states can use race to diversify their schools
It decided that Grutter's qualifications were not equal to those of the other applicants. -GRadpoint!----WRONG
it determined that states can use race to diversify their schools
The Supreme Court is one of the three branches of government. They appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.
The supreme court
A conservative member of the supreme court is likely to make a ruling against immigration,against abortion rights and against tightening gun laws.
The supreme court shapes public policy by ruling against or in the favor of some one in court.
no
In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School, ruling that the use of race as one of many factors in admissions does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court emphasized that the policy aimed to achieve a diverse student body, which is a compelling state interest. Therefore, while the ruling affirmed the importance of equal protection, it also recognized the legitimacy of considering race in specific contexts to promote diversity.
If a law is decided to be against the Constitution, the Supreme Court will declare it unconstitutional.
With the state supreme court.
The Supreme Court decisions that declared quota systems unconstitutional while allowing other forms of affirmative action include Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). In Bakke, the Court ruled that the specific quota system used by the University of California was unconstitutional, but it did not outlaw affirmative action entirely. Similarly, in Grutter, the Court upheld the use of race as one factor in admissions processes, emphasizing a holistic review approach rather than fixed quotas.