Thurgood Marshall cited the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the Equal Protection Clause, to argue that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional because it created a system of unequal educational opportunities based on race. He contended that segregated schools inherently implied that Black students were inferior, violating their rights to equal protection under the law. Marshall emphasized that education is a fundamental right essential for personal and societal development, and any law that enforced racial segregation deprived Black children of that right. Ultimately, he argued that the state-sanctioned separation of students by race was discriminatory and unjust.
marshall argued that segrgation was a violation of the fourteeth amendment marshall argued that segrgation was a violation odment idkvbse'Rtmkgw' stgkosdgvoksr thglsr hsperyue50ohkdrgohkdsr]odetk'[rtdkyd]rg f the fourteeth amen
One argument about segregation made by Thurgood Marshall before the Supreme Court was that African American students suffered damage from being treated differently.
Thurgood Marshall
Legal experts like Thurgood Marshall employed a strategy focused on using the judicial system to challenge and dismantle segregation and discrimination. They meticulously built legal cases that highlighted the unconstitutionality of Jim Crow laws by leveraging the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Marshall's approach emphasized the importance of precedent, culminating in landmark Supreme Court decisions like Brown v. Board of Education, which effectively overturned the "separate but equal" doctrine. This method combined legal advocacy with grassroots activism to promote civil rights reforms.
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789
Segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
marshall argued that segrgation was a violation of the fourteeth amendment marshall argued that segrgation was a violation odment idkvbse'Rtmkgw' stgkosdgvoksr thglsr hsperyue50ohkdrgohkdsr]odetk'[rtdkyd]rg f the fourteeth amen
One argument about segregation made by Thurgood Marshall before the Supreme Court was that African American students suffered damage from being treated differently.
Thurgood Marshall
The chief lawyer for the NAACP in the Brown v. Board of Education case was Thurgood Marshall. He played a pivotal role in arguing that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, ultimately leading to the landmark Supreme Court decision in 1954 that declared segregation in public education illegal. Marshall's efforts laid the foundation for the civil rights movement and he later became the first African American Supreme Court Justice.
One argument about segregation made by Thurgood Marshall before the Supreme Court was that African American students suffered damage from being treated differently.
The Supreme Court decided "separate but equal" (i.e.,segregation) was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, as long as the facilities or accommodations were equal.More InformationIn Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a Louisiana law, The Separate Car Act of 1890 (Act 111), requiring African-Americans and Caucasians to travel in separate railroad cars was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, as long as the accommodations provided for the African-Americans were equal to those provided for Whites.This validated the "separate but equal" doctrine whites used to avoid accepting African-Americans as peers, and allowed the proliferation of Jim Crow laws throughout the South. The decision validated segregation as legal.The ruling appeared to contradict a recent decision prohibiting segregation on trains traveling across state lines. In the earlier case, the Court invoked Congress' authority to regulate commerce between the states under the Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause, not the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In Plessy, the Court upheld the Louisiana state courts' ruling by a vote of 7-1 (Justice Brewer took no part in the case; Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented).The precedent in Plessy v. Ferguson held until explicitly overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954)Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)it legalized the public segregation of blacks and whites
The Supreme Court decided "separate but equal" (i.e.,segregation) was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, as long as the facilities or accommodations were equal.More InformationIn Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a Louisiana law, The Separate Car Act of 1890 (Act 111), requiring African-Americans and Caucasians to travel in separate railroad cars was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, as long as the accommodations provided for the African-Americans were equal to those provided for Whites.This validated the "separate but equal" doctrine whites used to avoid accepting African-Americans as peers, and allowed the proliferation of Jim Crow laws throughout the South. The decision validated segregation as legal.The ruling appeared to contradict a recent decision prohibiting segregation on trains traveling across state lines. In the earlier case, the Court invoked Congress' authority to regulate commerce between the states under the Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause, not the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In Plessy, the Court upheld the Louisiana state courts' ruling by a vote of 7-1 (Justice Brewer took no part in the case; Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented).The precedent in Plessy v. Ferguson held until explicitly overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954)Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)it legalized the public segregation of blacks and whites
Thurgood marshall
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789
He helped declare the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional.
African American students suffered damage from being treated differently. APEX