Answer 1
An excellent question. Many have said that it's because of the ubiquitous heavy anti-Israel bias.
Answer 2
There are several major reasons why more people and more media outlets are concerned with the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict than the much more lethal Syrian and Iraqi Insurgencies. For clarity's sake, as of August 7, 2014, less than 2,000 Palestinians have killed and around 300,000 have been internally displaced. Conversely, in the Syrian and Iraqi insurgencies, 190,000 Arabs have been killed cumulatively and at least 5,000,000 people have been displaced, with minorities disproportionately affected.
1) Unified Voice: On the Israeli-Palestinian questions, most people have implicitly chosen a side. Particularly in Muslim communities, there is almost unanimous support for Palestine and unanimous hatred and revilement towards Israel. In many Muslim communities, individuals who are openly Pro-Israel are attacked or beaten until their opinions change, preventing whatever small number of Pro-Israel Muslims from voicing their views. As a result if there is a desire to protest the actions of Israel, there is already a unified Muslim voice opposing Israel that can easily be corralled.
By contrast ISIL, the jihadist organization which has been responsible for re-instituting Taliban-like rule in Sunni dominated regions of Syria and Iraq, is a controversial question among Muslims, especially in the West. There is a strong argument, supported by older and more conservative Muslims that secularism is desirable because it allows everybody the ability to make Islam work for them. Many youths find that the West is full of moral depravity and, therefore, a religious theocracy would be desirable. Young Western Muslims have gone in the thousands to fight on either side of this conflict. As a result, there is no unified voice as to who to condemn and who to support.
2) Anti-Semitism: Vilifying Israel is seen as a socially-acceptable form of Anti-Semitism. While there are valid arguments to made against the State of Israel (see Anti-Zionism below), statements such endorsing the Nazis or Hitler, firebombing synagogues, posting pictures of European Jews and inciting for their murder on Facebook, are clear expressions of Anti-Semitism. Anti-Semites use the increase in Anti-Israel sentiment in order to promote their beliefs as well.
3) Racism of Lowered Expectations: Westerners do not often say this openly, but they do not often expect Non-Whites to behave as morally upright as they expect Whites to behave. For example, Mormons are often legally targeted for their polygamous marriages which are illegal. Arabs and Desis (Indians) are not similarly legally targeted, because it might "offend their culture" and cultural sensitivity is seen as desirable. In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the Israelis are judged according to the "White" standard and required to be more moral than their Arab enemies. Conversely, there is an "expectation" that Arabs will kill each other as they do in great numbers in Syria and Iraq. This double-standard is racist and demeaning to the value of every Arab life lost from Arab-led violence.
4) Apocalyptic Narratives: Many apocalyptic religious Jews, Christians, and Muslims see the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict as being the prelude to the first coming of the Messiah, the return of Jesus Christ, or the coming of the Mahdi respectively. As a result, religious individuals of all faiths are watching the conflict closely for signs of the "impending" apocalypse. Far fewer people eye the Syrian and Iraqi insurgencies with the same apocalyptic zeal.
5) Anti-Colonialism and Anti-Zionism: Since Israel was formed by Jews immigrating to Israel from places outside of Israel, there are a number of ethnic Europeans and Muslims who see Israel as one of the last colonial countries. They see promoting the Palestinians over the Israelis as part of the process of undoing the horrors of colonialism and making up for their mixed feelings concerning the creation of colonies in the Americas which completely supplanted the indigenous population, but are now strong, functioning societies. Additionally, there are those who simply oppose the right for Jews to have a state, which is Anti-Zionism. Of course, none of these things are issues in Syria and Iraq, since those countries are ruled by "native" populations, regardless of the fact that they are less majoritarian or respectful of their minorities than Israel.
when political is in upheaval
One of the clearest examples of conflict between the state and its citizens is the 1960s civil rights movement in the United States. Activists such as Martin Luther King Jr. challenged systemic racism and segregation enforced by state laws, leading to widespread protests, demonstrations, and government pushback. This conflict highlighted the struggle for equality and justice, as state authorities often responded with violence and repression against peaceful protesters. Ultimately, the movement resulted in significant legislative changes, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, showcasing how state actions can provoke significant social upheaval and demands for reform.
In the 1990s, Georgia experienced significant political and social upheaval following its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. The decade was marked by civil conflict, including the violent civil war from 1991 to 1993, which resulted in the rise of separatist movements in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Economic struggles and political instability characterized the period, leading to widespread corruption and the eventual Rose Revolution in 2003, which sought to establish democratic governance and reform.
Historians believe the decline of the Maya civilization resulted from a combination of factors, including environmental degradation, prolonged drought, and social upheaval. Intensive agricultural practices may have led to soil depletion, while climate change could have caused severe droughts, exacerbating food shortages. Additionally, internal conflict and warfare among city-states likely weakened their political structures and social cohesion, contributing to the overall decline.
The two sides that fought in the civil war following the Bolshevik Revolution were the Red Army, representing the Bolsheviks and their supporters, and the White Army, composed of a coalition of anti-Bolshevik forces, including monarchists, conservatives, and other groups opposing Bolshevik rule. The conflict lasted from 1917 to 1922 and resulted in the consolidation of Bolshevik power, leading to the establishment of the Soviet Union. The civil war was marked by significant violence, social upheaval, and widespread famine, profoundly impacting the course of Russian history.
when political is in upheaval
In 1971, the Perishing family faced significant challenges due to the political and social turmoil surrounding the Bangladesh Liberation War. The conflict resulted in widespread violence, displacement, and humanitarian crises, impacting countless families in the region. Additionally, the upheaval disrupted daily life, leading to shortages of food, resources, and safety for those caught in the turmoil.
His personnel action has been an upheaval of his own vision
it is a great upheaval when students are found plagerizing sentences.
It is a great upheaval when students are found out plagiarising sentences.
The American Revolution was the upheaval of British colonial rule.
Algeria won its independence from France in the mid-20th century, achieving this after a protracted and violent struggle known as the Algerian War of Independence, which lasted from 1954 to 1962. The conflict was marked by significant social and political upheaval and resulted in Algeria gaining full sovereignty on July 5, 1962. This event marked a pivotal moment in the decolonization process in Africa.
One of the clearest examples of conflict between the state and its citizens is the 1960s civil rights movement in the United States. Activists such as Martin Luther King Jr. challenged systemic racism and segregation enforced by state laws, leading to widespread protests, demonstrations, and government pushback. This conflict highlighted the struggle for equality and justice, as state authorities often responded with violence and repression against peaceful protesters. Ultimately, the movement resulted in significant legislative changes, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, showcasing how state actions can provoke significant social upheaval and demands for reform.
the wedding was in great upheaval due to the bride and groom's absence
The word upheaval is a noun. The plural is upheavals.
After World War I ended in 1918, Europe was left in a state of devastation and upheaval. The war resulted in significant loss of life, economic hardship, and widespread destruction of infrastructure. Political instability surged as empires like Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire collapsed, leading to the emergence of new nations. The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh reparations on Germany, fostering resentment and setting the stage for future conflict.
The word upheaval is a noun, a singular, common, abstract noun. The noun upheaval is an abstract noun when used as a word for a sudden, violent change or disruption. The noun upheaval is a concrete noun when used as a word for an upward displacement of part of the earth's crust.