No, not from past wars, but they always were involved, one way or another. In today's 21st century, a new type of war has surfaced; the war against terrorism (the Global War on Terrorists). This war involves police work (law enforcement work). For the first time, the US Military (in the middle 1990s) was authorized to operate in and as law enforcement.
This was due largely because of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990, and the accompanying US Military base closures. With no reason to exist, the US military was faced with "near" extinction (un-employment), and thusly, accepted the NEW ROLE of law enforcement.
So...now, "should civilians be military targets in wartime?" Under this new war (on terrorism) and under the new "military", civilians might be more involved than ever before...as the enemy (terrorists) DO NOT wear uniforms, and neither do civilians.
Generally, they didn't target civilians. The Nazi did, but allied forces didn't . Civilians in war are often considered just a product of war.
Soldiers were issued rations; civilians starved.
No. That is war.
yes
620,000 soldiers and an unknown number of civilians
Generally, they didn't target civilians. The Nazi did, but allied forces didn't . Civilians in war are often considered just a product of war.
how did world war 2 affect the civilians and the soldiers
Soldiers were issued rations; civilians starved.
Soldiers were issued rations; civilians starved.
Soldiers were issued rations; civilians starved.
Soldiers were issued rations; civilians starved.
No. That is war.
No food, no life. Soldiers were issued food, civilians had to starve...or sell...
Conscription.
The total was 13 million soldiers killed and 17 million civilians killed
Soldiers were issued rations; civilians starved.
Food is a necessity of life, can't live without it. Soldiers were issued food (rations), civilians had to sell what they had in order to eat. Or steal it.