Caesar's acceptance of the crown could have solidified his power and authority, allowing him to implement reforms more efficiently and stabilize the Roman Republic. By embracing kingship, he might have fostered unity and reduced political strife by providing a clear, centralized leadership. Additionally, as a strong military leader, he could have leveraged his position to protect Rome's interests and expand its territories. Ultimately, accepting the crown could have positioned him as a visionary ruler capable of steering Rome towards a prosperous future.
He says that Antony is "but a limb of Caesar" who will be powerless without the support of Caesar. He says this in support of his argument that Antony should not be murdered at the same time as Caesar. Of course, he was completely mistaken.
I think it is Brutus VS. Caesar.
In Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," Cassius believes they should kill Caesar to prevent him from gaining too much power and becoming a tyrant. He sees Caesar's ambition as a threat to the Republic and argues that eliminating him is necessary to preserve their freedom. Cassius persuades Brutus to join the conspiracy, emphasizing that Caesar's death is for the greater good of Rome.
i think caesar was a bad leader for many reasons. heres an example i think he was a bad leader, he became a dictator illegally.
It was a put up job to prove to the people that Caesar did not want to be a king. This meant that Caesar, as dictator-for-life, could have and exercise all the powers of a king, and the people of Rome (who had a history of anti-monarchism since the days of Tarquin) would not think of him as a king. As we see from later scenes with the Roman mob, they are indeed thick enough to fall for this kind of propaganda, and it is only a few (like Brutus and Cassius) who can see through it. Unfortunately, this kind of political machination is as effective now as it was then.
The idea was that Caesar would refuse the Crown, thus demonstrating to the mob that he didn't want the power of a king. And it worked. Of course Caesar did want and actually had all the power of a king, and what he was refusing were the trappings that went along with it. This was ok with him, and made the foolish crowd think that by refusing the trappings, he was also refusing the power.
The Romans did not say anything about Casca's thoughts. Any thoughts of his come from fiction: from Shakespeare's play. In Shakespeare's play, Casca does not explicitly disclose what he thinks Caesar's motive was for refusing the crown, but his scornful description of the reaction of the crowd when he did so ("the rabblement shouted, and clapped their chopped hands, and threw up their sweaty night-caps, and uttered such a deal of stinking breath because Caesar refused the crown, that it had almost choked Caesar") it would appear that Casca was of the view (surely correct) that the whole process was to amplify Caesar's already popular status with the mob.
He was an excellent leader, a strategic leader.(how he made the people think he was humble by refusing the crown). And he cares about the people of Rome. hope this helps
He says that Antony is "but a limb of Caesar" who will be powerless without the support of Caesar. He says this in support of his argument that Antony should not be murdered at the same time as Caesar. Of course, he was completely mistaken.
Cassius wants to kill Caesar
I think it is Brutus VS. Caesar.
I do. If two persons love each other then nothing else should matter. :)
he reads to much/ thinks to much
Julius Caesar
he says that Caesar is ambitious
Caesar was gaining to much power and the senate became jealous
Brutus likes Caesar but he is also jealous of him. He feels that if Caesar is made to be king then he may turn Rome in to a dictatorship.