William Wilberforce is considered a good leader primarily for his unwavering commitment to the abolition of the slave trade in the British Empire. His perseverance in advocating for social justice, despite facing significant opposition, showcased his moral courage and dedication to humanitarian principles. Wilberforce effectively mobilized public opinion and rallied support from various sectors, demonstrating his ability to inspire and unite others for a common cause. Additionally, his strong Christian faith guided his values and actions, reinforcing his role as a principled leader in the fight for equality and human rights.
William Wilberforce supported the RSPCA, the abolition of slavery and equal rights for homosexuals. If you want to know more, Wikipedia has a good page on him.
He was a very good leader
No, Harold was not a good leader and certainly not as good as William. One of the reasons for this answer is that whilst William prepared his troops the night before the battle, The Saxons got drunk and didn't seem to care. They also didn't have very good tactics or a good plan and I doubt Harold wanted to win as much as William. So consequently, Harold Godwineson was not a good leader.
Both John Newton and William Wilberforce had conversion experiences and became Evangelical Christians and both were Abolitionists. Wilberforce asked John Newton if he should preach and Newton convinced Wilberforce that he could be most effective in fighting the slave trade by remaining in Parliament. While they had different careers, they both worked together for the abolitionist movement. Wilberforce did some preaching. At that time it was illegal for a layman to preach in the same church more than once every six months. We do where he may have preached. Newton was a good friend of Whitefield, a great Calvinist evangelist of the great awakening. He too opposed slavery. At this point we can assume that Whitefield, Newton, Wilberforce, and Cowper composed a team opposing slavery.
He provide people with land
William Wilberforce supported the RSPCA, the abolition of slavery and equal rights for homosexuals. If you want to know more, Wikipedia has a good page on him.
he didnt have a good one even know his parents were rich he wasnt happy
a good leader
He met his wife, whilst he was touring round Europe wit his good friend Isoiac Milner
William was very well prepared which made him a good leader, he did the very clever trick of retreating down the hill!
He was a very good leader
William was a good king because he was well prepared and was a good leader.
yes
No, Harold was not a good leader and certainly not as good as William. One of the reasons for this answer is that whilst William prepared his troops the night before the battle, The Saxons got drunk and didn't seem to care. They also didn't have very good tactics or a good plan and I doubt Harold wanted to win as much as William. So consequently, Harold Godwineson was not a good leader.
Both John Newton and William Wilberforce had conversion experiences and became Evangelical Christians and both were Abolitionists. Wilberforce asked John Newton if he should preach and Newton convinced Wilberforce that he could be most effective in fighting the slave trade by remaining in Parliament. While they had different careers, they both worked together for the abolitionist movement. Wilberforce did some preaching. At that time it was illegal for a layman to preach in the same church more than once every six months. We do where he may have preached. Newton was a good friend of Whitefield, a great Calvinist evangelist of the great awakening. He too opposed slavery. At this point we can assume that Whitefield, Newton, Wilberforce, and Cowper composed a team opposing slavery.
nice and serious. good leader
he was a pretty swell guy.