Athenians choosing their officials can lead to issues such as populism and the selection of leaders based on popularity rather than competence. This system might result in the election of individuals who lack the necessary skills or experience, potentially undermining effective governance. Furthermore, it risks creating a political environment susceptible to demagoguery, where charismatic figures manipulate public sentiment for personal gain. Ultimately, this can compromise the quality of decision-making and the stability of the democratic process.
the citizens elected fair officials to create laws
In 490 BC, the king of the Athenians was not a single monarch, as Athens was a democracy at that time. The city was governed by elected officials and a council, with prominent leaders such as Cleisthenes and Miltiades playing significant roles. The Athenian political system had moved away from monarchy, focusing instead on democratic principles.
athenians ;)
No one played the Trojan horse against the Athenians. They are greek
The Athenians had a complex relationship with foreigners. While they valued trade and cultural exchange, leading to a degree of openness, many Athenians held a sense of superiority over non-Athenians and often viewed foreigners with suspicion. Additionally, citizenship was exclusive, and only native-born Athenians were granted full rights, which underscored a certain degree of xenophobia. Overall, while some Athenians appreciated the benefits of foreign interactions, others remained wary of outsiders.
Athenians chose the members of the council each year in a lottery. They believed this system was fairer than an election, which might favor the rich. There is one drawback to this method. Who ever was picked could be a bad person and change the Athenian history.
Because it was more fair than having an election. There would not be drawbacks in this method.
hyeythg
Athenians chose the members of the council each year in a lottery. They believed this system was fairer than an election, which might favor the rich. There is one drawback to this method. Who ever was picked could be a bad person and change the Athenian history.
freedom of speech
the citizens elected fair officials to create laws
they motivated the athenians hide from the persians because they were bad
Because it was more fair than having an election. There would not be drawbacks in this method.
The first president chose the federal officials on his their qualifications and from his support.
The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.The republic was set up in Rome so the people could choose their own leaders and officials and limit the time of their authority.
Although Athenians were Greeks, not all Greeks were Athenians.
Although Athenians were Greeks, not all Greeks were Athenians.