answersLogoWhite

0

Yes.MLM

AnswerNO many times no.The German Casualties in the Battle of Britain where heavy but not soo important for a defeat, the turning point was the Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Kursk in Europe.Nearly 1880 German planes where shot down and some 1550 british planes where destroyed.1.8 k planes detroyed means a lot now, but comparing them with the casualties sustained in the Eartern front that is a small casualty. Answerthe battle of Britain was a turning point in the war. if Britain would have lost, she would have certainly been invaded and out of the war. so there would have been no western front at all. Answeryes it was, a very big one aswell, because if the british hadnt have won they wouldn't have been able to send soldiers out to the other battles such as "the battle of Stalingrad" or "the battle of the kursk".
  • Have some of you people even read any WWII history or know what the Battle of Britain was? Britain did not fight at Stalingrad or the Kursk. The German casualties were limited to the crews of those 1880 planes. That's not "heavy casualties".
YESBritain didn't really 'win' the Battle of Britain as no one surrendered and no army was defeated. It was more that Hitler realized he could not win and turned his attention elsewhere. That allowed Britain to become a huge unsinkable aircraft carrier from which the RAF and US 8th Army Air Corps could strike Germany's homeland. In addition, without the British Isles to use as a staging point there could not have been a D-Day invasion and it would have been almost impossible to open a western front.

The answer to this question is NO. Britain did 'win' the Battle Of Britain in as much as The Luftwaffe was unable to gain air supremacy over the southern counties of England and thus could not fulfil the first requirement for a successful invasion.

BUT

If Germany had won the Battle and wounded the RAF sufficiently to prevent it's efective intervention against a seabourne attack it would have made no difference to the eventual outcome of any invasion. The key to Britain's defence in 1940 was still, as it had been for hundreds of years, the Royal Navy. Germany had no answer to what was at the time one of the largest and most powerful fleets in the world. Indeed, the German navy thought the idea of an invasion of England in 1940 to be suicidal regardless of the fate of the RAF. There is no doubt there would have been grievous losses in ships and men to the Royal Navy from air attacks and the many minefields the Germans would have laid to protect their invasion fleet but the result is not in doubt, the invasion barges would have been sunk and the vital resupply of the German army (which probably would have gained a bridgehead) would have been prevented. An army without supply is worse than useless and would have had to attempt evacuation. In the face of any surviving RN warships in the channel and British land force counter attacks, any evacuation would have resulted in disaster for the Germans.

All this was known to the Germans at the time and there is some evidence that an invasion of Britain was never really seriously contemplated by Hitler, rather he was using the threat of invasion to convince the British to sue for a peaceful settlement.

So, the Battle of Britain was a defeat for the Luftwaffe but didn't affect the eventual outcome of World War 2. The turning point was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 and the consequent German declaration of war on The United States. The enormous losses in men and material the Germans suffered on the eastern front seem decisive but ultimately the development of the nuclear bomb by the western allies would have rendered them irrelevant. Had the Germans not invaded Russia they would still have been defeated even if they had managed to conquer the United Kingdom.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Was the battle of Britain the turning point of World War 2?

No D day was


What was great Britain turning point in world war 2?

The Battle of El Alamein


What World War 2 battle marked a turning point for fighting in the Pacific?

The Battle of Britain.


What were major turning points in world war 2 with battle?

The Battle of Britain , the Battle of Midway , the Battle for Stalingrad and the D-Day invasion of the European Mainland .


Reasons why the battle of Britain was not a turning point in World War 2?

The Axis still had the upper hand after it.


What was the turning point of World War 2 with the battle of Britain?

when Germany started bombing civilian areas


What three battles were significant turning pionts in World War 2?

Battle of Britain Midway Stalingrad


Reasons why the battle of Britain was not a turning point in World War II?

Mistaken question - It WAS a turning point in WW2. Tt was the first major defeat for the Luftwaffe.


What was the major turning point in the war of Europe in world war 2?

D-Day invasion of Normandy, June 6th, 1944.


Which city had the most attacks on in Britain during world war 2?

London, which was heavily bombed by the Luftwaffe. (The Luftwaffe eventually stopped the bomb runs after the Battle of Britain, which took place near the turning point of the battle for air superiority.)


The Battle of was the turning point for the British in World War 2.?

the battle of Britain because Germany couldn't gain air superiority over England Hitler had to change his plans of invading


What were some of the major turning points for the allied forces in world war 2?

Midway, Battle of Britain, those are the biggest I can think of right now.