mainly because our society would not be what it is now if we didn't have it. people would be crazy if we didn't have both of them i could not be the young girl i am today if i didn't have certain rights.
The Anti-Federalists. They didn't think it was right to have rules without rights.
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the US Constitution.
the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution
The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution that guarantee individulal rights for the people.
the bill of rights is a document made to protect the rights of people of the U.S.A
They believed that the constitution needed a Bill of Rights to restrain the federal government.
The Bill of Rights came in the ratification of the constitution and the constitution was needed to form a government after the revolution.
in order for the states to ratify the u.s constitution, it needed a bill of rights.
The Bill of Rights, :)
The Bill of Rights was needed because some states (mainly New York and Virginia) wouldn't ratify the new Constitution in 1787. THey wanted some guarantees of personal liberties. They would ratify the Constitution if a bill of rights was added.
It lacked a Bill of Rights. The constitution was for the people. As needs change the people needed rights to amend the Constitution.
The Anti-Federalists. They didn't think it was right to have rules without rights.
The constitution needed more to it, such as a bill of rights, to accurately protect the rights of its citizens for generations to come.
A bill of rights
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.
If you mean the Anti-federalists, then the Bill of Rights.