answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

While it is true that people are generally apathetic about politics, that really varies. Certain elections seem to motivate the voters and get them to turn out at the polls. For example, in the 2008 election there was an increase in the number of young people and ethnic minorities; but in the 2010 midterm elections, these groups did not turn out in large numbers. This fluctuation has happened many times in history. Often a candidate is perceived as an agent of change (Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama are two examples of this perception) and people turn out because they believe this candidate will change the country's direction for the better.

But all too often, there is no one central issue or one exciting candidate who brings out large numbers of voters. As a result, the average person feels disconnected from the political process. Research also has shown that many people believe politicians are corrupt and dishonest, and there is no difference between them. While this is not always true, the belief that things are not going to change contributes to voter apathy, and keeps voter turnout low.

User Avatar

Wiki User

2011-06-30 05:53:22
This answer is:
User Avatar
Study guides

US Civil War

18 cards

Why were poll taxes created

What is a graduated income tax

What sparked the beginning of the Civil War

When Abraham Lincoln was elected president what was the result for the southern states

➡️
See all cards
3.78
156 Reviews

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is voter turnout usually so low?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why was the voter turnout so low in the 1996 US presidential election?

many reasons i want to know


Why is low voter turnout a serious problem?

Low voter turnout is a serious problem if the low turnout is due to intimidation at the polls or at registration, since it means the election is not fair and may not reflect the will of the people. However, if the low turnout is due to a lack of interest, it may not be so bad. It may be that the people who do not vote are content with letting the people who study the issues and know the candidates make the decisions on who goes into office. There have been times and places where food and liquor was offered at the polls to entice voters, but this practice has been made illegal in the US even though it probably increased vote turnout. High voter turnout , just in itself, may not be so good-- what is really needed is a high turnout of thoughtful, well-informed voters.


Voter turnout among 18-year-olds?

This is a statement please rewrite so there is a question.


Is voter turnout a problem?

Of course it is. Only 60% of Americans eligible to vote actually do so.


Describe voter trunout in the us?

Voter turnout in the US is typically low; only a relatively small percentage of those eligible to vote do so. Most frequent voters are older and more conservative. Less-frequent voters are younger. National elections typically get better turnout than local or state elections.


Which category of potential election problems does the passage describe?

If you got this passage the answer is Voting technology. Votes in one of the state's largest counties have come into question after voting machines malfunctioned, according to state elections spokesman Doug Brewster. Brewster says that the state has been trying to budget funds to upgrade the machines, but the state legislature has so far refused to approve the funding.


What are possible changes to elections that might help with voter fatigue or low-voter turnout?

In the US, voter fatigue has been increasing with the length of elections and the volume of media input during that time. As the costs go up, the requests for donations has also become part of the noise. When it is a time of great change, relationships are affected, so there is no time off. For the past year or so, and even days after the 2016 election, the news mostly is about one person. Low voter turnout is more difficult to address. For many, getting to the polls on the day of the election with the distractions of work and other places to go, seems less important than sticking to the schedule. Mail in ballots have been becoming more popular as they enable to people to fill out the ballot, sign it and put it into the mail. Not so easy if you do not open your mail or must determine an alternate plan if you have missed the last date to mail.


Why is voter turnout so low in the US?

The psychology of voting is tricky. Your vote is almost certainly not going to decide the outcome of an election. Even small, local elections usually involve thousands of people, and one vote out of thousands, or in larger elections, one vote out of millions, is not even going to be noticed, in all probability. And therefore, people often do not see any important reason to vote.


Who was the President of Montenegro in 2009?

Filip Vujanović was the President of Montenegro in 2009.Vujanović first served as Prime Minister of Montenegro from 1998 January 15 to 2002 November 25. He first became acting president on 2002 November 25 when then president Milo Đukanović resigned to become Prime Minister. Running in the 2003 February presidential election, he received the most votes but the election was invalidated due to low voter turnout. He then won the succeeding 2003 May elections (which also had low voter turnout) and resigned on May 19, so that he could be officially inaugurated as president 3 days later on May 22. After the split of Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, he was again re-elected in 2008.


Who was the President of Montenegro in 2008?

Filip Vujanović was the President of Montenegro in 2008.Vujanović first served as Prime Minister of Montenegro from 1998 January 15 to 2002 November 25. He first became acting president on 2002 November 25 when then president Milo Đukanović resigned to become Prime Minister. Running in the 2003 February presidential election, he received the most votes but the election was invalidated due to low voter turnout. He then won the succeeding 2003 May elections (which also had low voter turnout) and resigned on May 19, so that he could be officially inaugurated as president 3 days later on May 22. After the split of Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, he was again re-elected in 2008.


Who was the President of Montenegro in 2006?

Filip Vujanović was the President of Montenegro in 2006.Vujanović first served as Prime Minister of Montenegro from 1998 January 15 to 2002 November 25. He first became acting president on 2002 November 25 when then president Milo Đukanović resigned to become Prime Minister. Running in the 2003 February presidential election, he received the most votes but the election was invalidated due to low voter turnout. He then won the succeeding 2003 May elections (which also had low voter turnout) and resigned on May 19, so that he could be officially inaugurated as president 3 days later on May 22. After the split of Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, he was again re-elected in 2008.


Who was the President of Montenegro in 2004?

Filip Vujanović was the President of Montenegro in 2004.Vujanović first served as Prime Minister of Montenegro from 1998 January 15 to 2002 November 25. He first became acting president on 2002 November 25 when then president Milo Đukanović resigned to become Prime Minister. Running in the 2003 February presidential election, he received the most votes but the election was invalidated due to low voter turnout. He then won the succeeding 2003 May elections (which also had low voter turnout) and resigned on May 19, so that he could be officially inaugurated as president 3 days later on May 22. After the split of Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, he was again re-elected in 2008.

People also asked