0
The Constitution was originally written with no amendments. The part before the Bill of Rights has everything about how to run a government and nothing guaranteeing the rights of any citizen. The antifederalists wanted a Bill of Rights to ensure the Constitution guaranteed rights to citizens.
What else can I help you with?
Why did the federalists argue against inclusion of a bill of rights in the US Constitution?
Federalists opposed the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution because they believed that the Constitution itself was a bill of rights, establishing a framework that limited government power and protected individual liberties. They argued that listing specific rights could be dangerous, as it might imply that any unlisted rights were not protected. Additionally, they felt that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary in a republic where the government was accountable to the people and its powers were clearly defined.
Did most state constitutions did not have a bill of rights at the time of the constitutional convention?
Many of the state constitutions contained a Bill of Rights at the time of the Convention. That was one of the reasons that a Bill of Rights was not included in the original version of theU.S. Constitution. Anti-Federalists feared that without a Bill of Rights inserted in the Constitution, the new federal government might be able to interfere or deny some of the rights of the citizens.
What is the difference between federalist and anti federalist?
There were many, but it can be summarized as such: Federalists believed in a stronger centralized government and that the states were essentially part of one union that could enact laws upon all states. This party was primarily driven by Alexander Hamilton who correctly saw the need for this to happen from a economic stand-point, to pay off America's early debt and to establish a unified currency. The Anti-Federalists believed in strong states rights and a very minimalist federal government for many reasons. One such was a rational fear that a central government's president might be thought of as a King; whom they had just fought a revolutionary war against. Eventually the less-popular Federalists lost their power and for a period of time America had a one-party system within the Anti-Federalist party called the Democrat Republicans.
Why should you be a federalist instead of anti federalist?
Well, back then, you wouldn't be executed for your thoughts, even today. Some people supported it, called the Federalists, because those people thought that the Constitution stated their rights and were satisfied with it for some reason. But, there were some colonists who thought that the plan might result in a strong national government, which might turn into monarchy (king rule over land- King George 3's tight rule over Britain was an influence of chenges in the Constitution) which was the last thing they wanted. So a bill of rights was added to the Constitution which stated the basic of people which cannot be taken away for any reason, even race, looks, complexion, or just to favor the branches of government. And then all 13 colonies ratified the Constitution (along with the Bill of Rights). And that is the modern document today, still intact. Hope that answers your question.
What would need to be done in order to make the Louisiana purchase permissible within the framework of the constitution?
What reason might the federalists have for Opposing President Thomas Jefferson's plan
Why might the anti-federalists have wanted the bill of rights in the documents?
The Constitution was originally written with no amendments. The part before the Bill of Rights has everything about how to run a government and nothing guaranteeing the rights of any citizen. The antifederalists wanted a Bill of Rights to ensure the Constitution guaranteed rights to citizens.
How did the federalists and anti-federalists settle their differences?
The Federalists wished to grant some definite power to the new American government, which would enable them to manage their own affairs without having to beg the various states to go along. The anti-Federalists feared that the government might use its powers to eliminate the liberties of the people. They finally agreed on a Bill of Rights, incorporated into the Constitution itself. The Federalists had protested that since the Constitution didn't give the Federal government power to perform some actions, that the government wouldn't be able to do that; the anti-Federalists wanted explicit guarantees. So the Anti-federalists gained specific rights for the people, rights that the Federalists had said were never in any danger. History has proven that the Anti-Federalists were correct, and the Federalists were naive in the extreme; government ALWAYS gathers more powers than its founders had intended.
Did anti federalists want the states or central government to have more power?
Federalists favored the passage of the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed passage because, among other things, they thought the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the state governments. So clearly the Federalists wanted stronger national government and the Anti-Federalists wanted a weaker national government (and, in a zero-sum game, stronger state governments). The ensuing discussion led to the Bill of Rights.
Who supported the Bill of Rights in the constitution?
The federalists. In the Call to Freedom text book for social studies, it says a federalists is "People who support the Constitution." This means that they would also support the Bill of Rights considering the Bill of Rights is in the Constitution.
What was the main concern for the Antifederalists?
The anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would take away critical powers from the states, and warned that without a Bill of Rights the government might also take away the rights of the people that were just won in the Revolution.
Why did Anti-Federalists believe that the design of the constitution was insufficient to protect individual rights and lead to violations of the rights by the new national government?
AnswerThe anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would take away critical powers from the states, and warned that without a Bill of Rights the government might also take away the rights of the people that were just won in the Revolution.
What was the Anti-Federalists' main concern about the Constitution?
The anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would take away critical powers from the states, and warned that without a Bill of Rights the government might also take away the rights of the people that were just won in the Revolution.
What was added to constitution for anti federalists?
Bill of Rights
Why did federalists say that democratic-republicans were dangerous?
I am somewhat guessing that Federalists would monger fears that their opponents who favored states rights over federal power and strongly supported individual freedom by saying they might start a revolution and destroy the union of the states.
What was the Anti-Federalists' greatest concern about ratifying the U.S. Constitution?
Generally speaking, anti-Federalists feared that a too powerful central government might conflict with the states ( former colonies ) own constitutions which guaranteed so many freedoms that were held sacred by state politicians, leaders and ordinary citizens. To overcome the fears of the anti-Federalists, James Madison was assigned the task to create a bill of rights that made sure that a too powerful central government would take away their rights. Madison came up with twelve amendments, however the Framers decided to use only ten of them.
What group opposed a Bill of Rights?
The Federalists oppsed the Bill of Rights, they opposed it because they thought that the Constitution had already given its citizens rights and they feared that the Bill of Rights might even limit people to those specific rights and that it gave the government too much power and limited the states the right to self-governship.
Differences between federalists and anti federalists?
A federalist was a person who want power removed from the states to the national government, wanted the three branch government style that we use today, wanted a single person to head the the executive branch, and also wanted the US Constitution to pass and go into effect, an anti-federalist was a person who wanted political powers to stay within the states, wanted the legislature to have more power than the executive branch, feared of one leader for the executive branch, because he might try to become a king or tyrant, wanted a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution, this did happen, and wanted the constitution changed before it passed; these views were argued over from about 1787-1790.
