The greatest crime in the Roman lexicon was that of rebellion. They were constantly concerned that rebellion might spread unrest throughout all of their colonies. Judea was centrally located and possessed a populace with religious motivation and with belief in Redemption. Background: Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, the two sons of the Jewish King Yannai (Johanan Hyrcanus, 1st century BCE), got the Romans involved in Judea when they asked them to settle a dispute. At first the Romans were cordial; and they actually became party to a military treaty with Judea (Talmud, Avodah Zara 8b). The Romans didn't interfere much in Jewish internal matters, because the main thing that they wanted was taxes and a quiet populace. In the first two centuries CE, things got worse, with the Romans destroying Jerusalem and the Second Temple after the Jewish Zealots attempted to revolt. The Romans sold hundreds of thousands of Jews into slavery (Josephus). From time to time they forbade the observance of the Torah-commands, and they killed several of the leading Sages, despite the fact that the Torah-leaders had advised against revolt (Talmud, Gittin 56a). Later, Simeon Bar Kochba led a second revolt, in an ill-advised attempt to recreate the independent Judea. The Romans responded by destroying Betar. See also:
A couple of decades later, however, they unilaterally abrogated the treaty, and placed Roman governors over the land who afflicted the Jews with crushing taxation (Talmud, Yoma 9a).
depends. if they broke the rules, they were treated harshly, but other than that, they were treated fine.
Because the people who enslaved them had no respect for them or their culture. To them, the slaves were less than human beings. They were harshly mistreated because they were simply "different."
No
The Hans didn't rule harshly like the Qins in their dynasty of ancient China. The Han dynasty was China's Golden Age anyway.
yes
The comparative form of "harshly" is "more harshly."
No, "harshly" is an adverb. It describes how an action is done.
Yes, harshly is an adverb.Some example sentences using this word are:The judges harshly criticised his performance.She harshly scolded her child.
The Catholic Church responded through the Catholic (or Counter) Reformation. They acknowledged there was corruption in the church, though they restated their intentions to keep the sacraments. Calvinists, on the other hand, were treated more harshly.
why did the spaniards treat the Aztecs harshly
The word "harsh" is an adjective.
-ly is the suffix for harshly. It means in the matter of and turns it into a adverb.
According to Erikson's theory, if a toddler is punished harshly or restrained severely, they may develop feelings of shame and doubt. This can affect their sense of autonomy and their ability to explore and interact with their environment confidently.
"Don't touch that!" the angry man growled harshly.
you can say, harshly or roughly to be opposite of gently
The Chinese were treated harshly due to a combination of factors such as racism, economic competition, and xenophobia. They faced discriminatory laws, violence, and social exclusion, particularly in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries when Chinese immigrants were seen as a threat to white Americans.
No, it is not necessary to speak harshly. Effective communication can be achieved through kindness, understanding, and respect. Speaking harshly can often lead to misunderstandings and strain relationships.