answersLogoWhite

0

Because Japan refused to surrender. Japan did not believe in surrender. They felt every Japanese person, men women children, civilian, military should die to save the emperor. It was the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki or the invasion of Japan. The invasion of Japan would have killed a lot more people than the two atomic bombs did. Japan surrendered after Nagasaki was bombed. It was the lesser of two evils and saved countless Allied and Japanese lives. There was No other way other than invasion to defeat Japan.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Should he drop the atomic bomb to defeat japan?

Japan surrendered after Hirshoma and Nagaski were bombed. That says it all. The atomic bombing of two cities brought the war to an end.


How did the atomic bomb result in japan?

It didn't. Japan existed long before the atomic bomb


Who approved the dropping of an atomic bomb on japan?

Harry s. truman approved the dropping of an atomic bomb on japan.


When did the US Use atomic bomb on japan?

The US dropped the atomic bomb onto Japan on August 1945.


Who did the US bomb with the atomic bomb?

The first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan ; another on Nagasaki, Japan, 3 days later.


Who is the made the first atom bomb?

The USA created the first atomic bomb in New Mexico in the closing stages of World War Two. They used it to defeat Japan.


What type of bomb was drop on japan?

atomic bomb


Did anyone even negotiate with japan about the atomic bomb?

Japan was negotiatin with the Soviet Union as the first atomic bomb was dropped.


Japan after atomic bomb?

Reconstruction.


What city was bomb with the first atomic bomb?

Hiroshima, Japan


When was Nagasaki hit with an atomic bomb?

One day after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima in Japan.


What two arguments does Bard give against the use of the atomic bomb?

Bard argued that the use of the atomic bomb was unnecessary for Japan's surrender as they were already close to defeat, and that it caused unnecessary civilian casualties. Additionally, he believed that the decision to use the bomb should have been considered at a higher level of government rather than by military commanders.