Alexander the great was successful in his military conquest of the known world at the time for several reasons. His crafty tactical mind and military daring should be noted, as should his diplomatic skill and the element of luck. Above all, he led a highly skilled and adaptable group of military units, each specialized in their duties yet able to do otherwise at a moment's notice. The troops were thoroughly loyal, as well, which sharply contrasted with the various enemy-troops faced by Alexander during his campaigns.
Yes, Phillip the II was Alexander the greats fatherPhillip the II was the ruler of Macedonia and was killed by an assassin so Alexander then became the ruler of Macedonia
It was cut short by his premature death so we don't know whether he was a capable ruler or just a good general.
Saladin was an Obvious sucessful ruler, he became so famous he had all the good stuff
He created many different laws, and many people followed them, and he was the ruler of the Babylon kingdom in 1792 B.C., so I would say yes, he was an effecive ruler.
Alexander was so Successful at spreading his empire because he was Very clever, intelligent, brave and was a fierce warrior. Also he had good strategies.
Yes, Phillip the II was Alexander the greats fatherPhillip the II was the ruler of Macedonia and was killed by an assassin so Alexander then became the ruler of Macedonia
It was cut short by his premature death so we don't know whether he was a capable ruler or just a good general.
Saladin was an Obvious sucessful ruler, he became so famous he had all the good stuff
Alexander was so Successful at spreading his empire because he was Very clever, intelligent, brave and was a fierce warrior. Also he had good strategies.
the general that did so was Lysimachus
He created many different laws, and many people followed them, and he was the ruler of the Babylon kingdom in 1792 B.C., so I would say yes, he was an effecive ruler.
In my opinion I think he was not, he was just a good ruler not so much great because he had killed so much people and he was cruel man.
Ancient Greece was made up of a lot of small city states, which were each ruled by their own individual ruler. There was no ruler of all of Ancient Greece until the time of Phillip II, Alexander the Great's father, who united all of Greece and Macedonia.
Alexander was so Successful at spreading his empire because he was Very clever, intelligent, brave and was a fierce warrior. Also he had good strategies.
Alexander the Great was able to build such a large and expansive empire because of his warfare strategy. Alexander the Great was able to defeat any enemy that crossed his path, which allowed him to conquer all of the countries he entered and add them to his empire.
As he defeated his armies three times and disabled his fleet, it would seem so.
in general, I should think so yes.If they were not, devices such as mobile phones and satellite tv would not work...