He was a successful king because he conquered England
and invented a feudal system
No, King John was not a direct successor to William the Conqueror. William the Conqueror, who reigned from 1066 to 1087, was succeeded by his son, William II, and then his other son, Henry I. King John, who reigned from 1199 to 1216, was the son of Henry II and a descendant of William the Conqueror through the Plantagenet lineage.
Yes william the conqueror is edward the confessors 2nd cousin
no
As King, William the Conqueror would have had no one to lord over him. He fought for no other mans banner but his own as king.
they were all apart of the battle of Hastings in 1066. William the conqueror was the king of England in 1066 .
William the Conqueror was the Scandinavian King who took over England after Ethelred died. King Edward was not the successor to William the Conqueror.
William the Conqueror was the Scandinavian King who took over England after Ethelred died. King Edward was not the successor to William the Conqueror.
No.
No, King John was not a direct successor to William the Conqueror. William the Conqueror, who reigned from 1066 to 1087, was succeeded by his son, William II, and then his other son, Henry I. King John, who reigned from 1199 to 1216, was the son of Henry II and a descendant of William the Conqueror through the Plantagenet lineage.
William, Duke of Normandy, who become known as William the Conquerer after he became King of England.
No, William Rufus was William the Conqueror's son. William I = William the Conqueror William II = William Rufus
Yes william the conqueror is edward the confessors 2nd cousin
William I (the Conqueror) lived: 1028-1087.He was the first Norman king of England.
William I, known as William the Conqueror.
1066
William the Conqueror
food