Some Romans welcomed the Huns' conquest as it disrupted the power of the Eastern Roman Empire and weakened their oppressive rule. Additionally, the Huns' invasions led to the displacement of other tribes, which sometimes resulted in temporary relief from local conflicts and taxes. For some, the promise of new opportunities and the prospect of a different governance under the Huns seemed preferable to the Roman status quo.
In which battle did the romans defeat the huns in 451?
Ostrogoths
the Huns. They were a nomadic group from the north.
They displaced the Scythians and conquered Sogdiana and Khorasan before 425. They crossed (425) the Syr Darya (Jaxartes) River and invaded Persia. Held off at first by Bahram Gur, they later (483-85) succeeded in making Persia tributary. After a series of wars (503-13) they were driven out of Persia, permanently lost the offensive, and were finally (557) defeated by Khosru I. The White Huns also invaded India and succeeded in extending their domain to include the Ganges valley. They temporarily overthrew the Gupta empire but were eventually driven out of India in 528 by a Hindu coalition. Although in Persia they had little effect, in India the White Huns influenced society by altering the caste system and disrupting the hierarchy of the ruling families. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-WhiteHun.html
The Huns invaded central and eastern Europe north of the river Danube They did not invade the empire. The carried out devastating raids in the Balkans. Later they tried to invade Gaul, but were defeated. The Huns caused population pressure on the land in the area they expanded into to increase. This led to the invasion of Gaul by the Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians . The Alemanni of southern Germany took advantage of this to invade northeast France and Switzerland. The Romans' inability to deal with the invasions showed fading power This was made worse by infighting between the Romans and their political instability.
They weren’t happy about it and did everything they could to stop it.
The Romans were not conquered by the Huns. The Huns settled north of the river Danube, part of the border of the Roman Empire. They carried out many raids south of that river, but did not make any conquests there. They tried to invade Gaul, but they were defeated and repelled by a combined army of Romans, Franks, and Visigoths. Soon after this, the Hun empire disintegrated.
The Romans were not conquered by the Huns. The Huns settled north of the river Danube, part of the border of the Roman empire. They carried out many raids south of that river, but did not make any conquests there. They tried to invade Gaul, but they were defeated and repelled by a combined army of Romans, Franks, and Visigoths. Soon after this, the Hun empire disintegrated.
The Huns did not conquer the Roman Empire. They raided the eastern part of the empire three times, tried to invade Gaul but were repelled, and tried to invade to Italy, but had to give up because of a famine in Italy and because the Roman army attacked their homeland. It was said that some Gallo-Romans did not mind the conquests by the Germanic peoples because they were unhappy with the Roman state's oppressive taxation regime.
In which battle did the romans defeat the huns in 451?
The Romans
Ostrogoths
I would say the Romans because they had better technology.
They fought fearsomely.
the Huns. They were a nomadic group from the north.
The barbarians who conquered Rome were called the Goths.
Simon MacDowall has written: 'Adrianopole AD 378' 'Romans, Goths, and Huns'