Probably because the king's pay would convince judges to side with the king, making for a biased court system.
Since the Judge was being paid for by the king, he would want to rule in favor of the king.
If the judges were being paid by the King Of England, then their ruling would tend to more in the direction of the King's rule. There was no uniquely American law, as it were, in this country until 1776 when the War of Independence took place and the Bill of Rights was drafted so the law of the land was still the same as Great Britain's.
they were unhappy with the king becase he taxed tea.
American colonists were unhappy with British rule primarily due to taxation without representation and restrictions on their economic activities. The imposition of taxes, such as the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts, angered colonists who believed they should not be taxed by a Parliament in which they had no representatives. Additionally, British trade regulations limited colonial trade with other nations, stifling economic growth and fostering resentment towards British control.
American colonists were unhappy with the British due to taxation without representation, as they were forced to pay taxes like the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts without having a voice in Parliament. Additionally, the British imposed restrictive trade policies that limited colonial economic growth and independence. The presence of British troops in the colonies, especially during peacetime, further fueled resentment, as it was seen as an infringement on their rights and liberties.
The colonists were outraged.
because he gave unfair taxes and they had no representation in Parliament to be on their side and give their side of the story. And
they were unhappy with the king becase he taxed tea.
they were unhappy because they were being tax way too
they dont do nothing
American colonists were unhappy with British rule primarily due to taxation without representation and restrictions on their economic activities. The imposition of taxes, such as the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts, angered colonists who believed they should not be taxed by a Parliament in which they had no representatives. Additionally, British trade regulations limited colonial trade with other nations, stifling economic growth and fostering resentment towards British control.
What experience did Captain Peters have that showed the colonists were unhappy with Loyalists?
American colonists were unhappy with the British due to taxation without representation, as they were forced to pay taxes like the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts without having a voice in Parliament. Additionally, the British imposed restrictive trade policies that limited colonial economic growth and independence. The presence of British troops in the colonies, especially during peacetime, further fueled resentment, as it was seen as an infringement on their rights and liberties.
because Britain was controlling every aspect of their lives and they wanted to be free and independent from Britain
It gave some courage and determination but made others unhappy.
The colonists were outraged.
several reasons: 1)the Americans were ruled by the british,and were unhappy with the taxes that were being imposed on them by the british parliament. 2)European writers like jean Jacques Rousseau wrote books about how people should rule a country,and not a king or queen.this was known as the enlightenment. 3)the Boston massacre-American colonists were protesting against taxes,when british soldiers opened fire and killed 5 people. 4)the Boston tea-party-American colonists were unhappy with taxes on tea,so they disguised themselves as native Americans,and dumped all the tea into Boston harbour.as a result of this,the british parliament closed the port of Boston.
Yes, it was. The Colonists were very unhappy with having to provide quarters for soldiers in their houses.
because he gave unfair taxes and they had no representation in Parliament to be on their side and give their side of the story. And