0
Why would it help the empire to have only a few rulers who ruled for long periods of time?
Having a few rulers who govern for extended periods can create stability and continuity within an empire. This consistency allows for the development of long-term policies and strategies, fostering economic growth and social cohesion. Additionally, strong, enduring leadership can help unify diverse populations under a common vision, reducing the likelihood of internal conflict and promoting loyalty among subjects. Ultimately, this can enhance the empire's strength and resilience against external threats.
What else can I help you with?
How many emperors ruled during the 507 year in existed?
The Roman Empire experienced a significant number of emperors during its 507-year existence, particularly within its early and late periods. From the establishment of the empire in 27 BCE to the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE, there were approximately 70 recognized emperors. However, if you consider the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) alongside it, the total number of emperors would exceed this figure significantly. The count can vary based on the criteria used to define legitimate rulers and co-emperors.
Why would many rulers try to bring back the Roman Empire?
they had a big civilization
Which group is was more successful in ruling rome kingsemperorsor roman republic?
It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.
What empire defeated the Egyptian empire?
The Civilization that defeated Egypt, was the Persian Empire or also known as the Achaemenid Empire. The Persian Empire defeated the Egyptians while Cyrus The Greats Son (Cambyses II) was reigning over the Empire. The Egyptians didn't even bother to try and stop the Persian Empire as they we sick of their previous ruler. So I think the answer you are looking for is the Achaemenid Empire. Although they did capture Egypt, after the Persian Empire finished, all of the empire broke up into lots of different countries, as this was when the Persian Empire Fell.Hopefully This Helped.
What type of government did Alexander the great have?
Absolute monarchy. He was a king in fact as well as name. His word literally was the law. For practical reasons he adopted much of the administrative methods of the Persians, and relied on loyal followers to serve as rulers of different parts of his empire. But they remained in power at his sufferance. Once Alexander died, they would end up carving his Empire into competing nations.oligarchy. his kingdom was ruled by a king. himself.
What is an empire called that has many rulers?
There is not really a name for that, unless you would count members of Parliament/Congress as 'rulers' too. In that case, such an empire would be called a democracy.
How many emperors ruled during the 507 year in existed?
The Roman Empire experienced a significant number of emperors during its 507-year existence, particularly within its early and late periods. From the establishment of the empire in 27 BCE to the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE, there were approximately 70 recognized emperors. However, if you consider the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) alongside it, the total number of emperors would exceed this figure significantly. The count can vary based on the criteria used to define legitimate rulers and co-emperors.
Why would many rulers try to bring back the Roman Empire?
they had a big civilization
Which group is was more successful in ruling rome kingsemperorsor roman republic?
It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.
What empire defeated the Egyptian empire?
The Civilization that defeated Egypt, was the Persian Empire or also known as the Achaemenid Empire. The Persian Empire defeated the Egyptians while Cyrus The Greats Son (Cambyses II) was reigning over the Empire. The Egyptians didn't even bother to try and stop the Persian Empire as they we sick of their previous ruler. So I think the answer you are looking for is the Achaemenid Empire. Although they did capture Egypt, after the Persian Empire finished, all of the empire broke up into lots of different countries, as this was when the Persian Empire Fell.Hopefully This Helped.
What is the difference between a dynasty and a monarchy?
An Empire is a group of states or territories or ethnic groups under a single ruling power. Eg;Roman empire,Mauryan empire,Persian empire. A Dynasty means a succession or series of rulers of the same family,where the power and title is passed from generation to generation. Eg:Mughal dynasty.
Would a kingdom or empire have a larger population?
An Empire is usually a large number of kingdoms ruled over by one conquering kingdom or nation, and therefore an empire would usually have a much larger population
What happened to these aspects of Egyptian culture when Kush regained its independence?
Answer it for me
How ruled east of Rome and west of Rome?
During the later periods of the Roman Empire, there was one "ruler" or emperor of the western half and one emperor of the eastern half. The eastern half would later be referred to as the Byzantine Empire. The original ruler of the eastern Rome, and the man who introduced the split was Diocletian. His western counter part was Maximian.
What are the three modern countries that would exist in the roman territory?
There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.
Has the US ever been in a empire?
An empire is defend as A political unit having an extensive territory or comprising a number of territories or nations and ruled by a single supreme authority... The US is Ruled by three (3) equal authorities which can be removed by its people ... So i would have to say NO...
How do you spell rulers in Spanish?
Wooden rulers would be "reglas." Governing rulers would be "gobernantes" (governors).
