Asoka, the Mauryan emperor known for his promotion of non-violence and Buddhism, would likely bring a unique perspective to modern governance. His emphasis on ethical leadership, social welfare, and religious tolerance could resonate well in today's diverse societies. However, his methods of spreading his ideals through edicts might face challenges in a contemporary context where democratic values and human rights are prioritized. Overall, while his principles could inspire good governance, adapting them to modern political frameworks would be essential for effective leadership.
I couldn't find "asoka" but I found chakra , chakra means energy... and I also think asoka-chakra has something to do with (good energy or bad energy its around that)
He thought that they were all nasty Facks and wanted them to all be his slaves
Richard the 3rd was a good ruler for lionhearted he also was a good man,brave and strong.
asoka
Tutankhaum was a good ruler because he reintroduced the Gods.
Title: Asoka, The Great Author: Emil Lengyel Publisher: Franklin Watts, Inc. Copyright 1969 LCCN 71-83650 After being 'Asoka, The Terrible' for many years, his contemporaries gave him the new title 'The Great'. Today, more people in the world know his name than the name 'Jesus Christ.' Asoka was personally responsible for the dissemination of Budism.
Balban was considered a firm ruler, he ruled with an iron fist, and by today's standards he would be considered a dictator, with a slave culture, he definately couldn'tÊbe calledÊweak, but not sure ifÊhe would beÊconsidered good.
He was a good ruler because if nobody listened to him then he would kill them
I couldn't find "asoka" but I found chakra , chakra means energy... and I also think asoka-chakra has something to do with (good energy or bad energy its around that)
Yes, according to google
I believe not because Rome was a democracy of sort and had a senate which is almost like today's American Congress. If a barbarian warlord becomes ruler of the Roman Empire, Rome would be anoligarchy. Also, the barbarian ruler would gain too much power and the senate will have to "remove" him ;).
a good one
Yes, he was a good ruler
He thought that they were all nasty Facks and wanted them to all be his slaves
How was Hadrian a good or bad ruler
chandragupta and asoka both had changing moments in there life like chandragupta became paranoid and starved himself to death and asoka experienced a bloody war so he converted to buddhism and spread the religeon to places.
she is the best ruler because she loves Canadian bacon.