answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Goals that are very clear or easy to specify usually produce more conflict?

When goals are very clear or easy to specify, there may be increased conflict because people may have differing opinions on the best methods to achieve the goal. Clarity can sometimes lead to rigidity in approaches, causing disagreements on how to proceed. Additionally, when goals are clearly defined, individuals may feel more pressure to meet expectations, which can lead to conflict if there are obstacles in the way.


What is the significance of the?

Mob rule led to control by the masses. This could lead to the attack of minorities. Anythimg that went against the overall beliefs of the mob was attacked. This anarchist method lead to much conflict in situations were the people opposed the government.


What is the significance of the mobocracy?

Mob rule led to control by the masses. This could lead to the attack of minorities. Anythimg that went against the overall beliefs of the mob was attacked. This anarchist method lead to much conflict in situations were the people opposed the government.


How do you use steer in a sentence?

Steer:noun: an ox less than four years old; a male domestic ox castrated before sexual maturity and especially one raised for beef.verb: to direct the course or the course of; to follow a course of action; to be guided.Example sentences:Effective advisers steer their students toward the professors that are the best teachers, and toward the courses that will lead to the best job offers upon graduation.I try to steer clear of religious and political topics.Who will steer the way for the cattle?The pranksters failed to steer the woman in the wrong direction.


In your opinion is avoiding an effective conflict management strategy Why or why not?

Avoiding can be an effective conflict management strategy in certain situations, particularly when the conflict is minor or when emotions are running high, as it allows time for cooling off. However, consistently avoiding conflict can lead to unresolved issues, resentment, and deterioration of relationships over time. It's essential to assess the context and potential consequences; sometimes, addressing the conflict directly can lead to more constructive outcomes. Ultimately, a balanced approach that includes both avoidance and active resolution can be most effective.


How can the Bible guide us in handling situations where we are tempted to argue with a fool?

The Bible advises us to avoid arguing with fools, as it can lead to more conflict. Instead, it encourages us to respond with patience, wisdom, and kindness. By following these teachings, we can handle such situations with grace and avoid unnecessary strife.


Can a US Supreme Court justice be impeached due to conflict of interest issues?

No. Recusal (disqualifying oneself from a case) for conflict of interest is a voluntary action; justices cannot be penalized for refusing to do so. Unfortunately, this has lead to situations where justices have heard -- and voted on -- cases in which they should not have been involved.


How Wilmot Proviso lead to conflict?

The Wilmot Proviso lead to conflict because it specifically says that no slavery is allowed in any parts of Mexico.


What were the events that lead to the conflict?

John Flinken caused the conflict


What topics of conversation you should avoid at first meeting?

At a first meeting, it's best to avoid sensitive topics such as politics, religion, and personal finances, as these can lead to discomfort or conflict. Additionally, steer clear of discussing controversial issues or any personal matters that might be too intimate for a casual introduction. Focus instead on neutral topics like hobbies, interests, or light-hearted current events to foster a positive and engaging conversation.


How conflict start?

A conflict begins usually when different sides disagree. This can lead to dispute and conflict.


Does war solve conflict?

No. But it can lead to it. War is conflict. It often creates more entrenchment on both sides of a conflict.