Yes, Christians gained permanent control of Jerusalem during the Crusades, particularly after the First Crusade in 1099, when they captured the city and established the Kingdom of Jerusalem. This Christian rule lasted until 1187, when Saladin recaptured the city. Although there were subsequent periods of Christian control, such as during the brief reconquest by European powers in the late 13th century, Jerusalem has not been under permanent Christian control since Saladin's victory.
The crusades started because the Pope wanted to reclaim the Holy Land from Muslim control. While there were actually many small crusades, there are four major ones that stick out in history. The first crusade, from 1095-1099, is considered a Christian success because the crusaders were able to reclaim Jerusalem. The second crusade, from 1145-1148 was fought to claim Edessa from the Muslims. The crusaders lost the battle. The third crusade, from 1187-1191, was fought to attempt to reclaim Jerusalem from Saludin. While the crusaders did not win Muslim control, Christians were given free citizen access. The fourth crusade, from 1198-1204, was the most brutal. The crusaders ended up attacking their own cities and causing devastation to their own people, without ever making it to the Holy Land.
Well the holy land is Jerusalem so yes in the first crusade.
The Zealots were not interested in rebellion against Christians. The Zealots were those Jews of the first and early second centuries who advocated rebellion against Impereial Rome in order to establish an independent Jewish country. Twice, once in the years 68-72 and again in 132-136, the Roman provence of Judea rose in revolt and drove Rome out of Jerusalem. Each time, all the Jews of Roman Judea were, whether they wanted to or not, forced to either join the rebellion or go into hiding. Each time, it took Rome a few years to mobilize a response to crush the rebellion. The responses they mobilized were massive, pulling in legions from as far away as Germany. The second revolt led Rome to rename Judea as Palistinia, ban Jews from ever living in Jerusalem (which they also renamed), and ban the teaching of Judaism.
Well in a posative way it made people come to peace, understand each other and be more multicultural. However despite the differences they have settled, lots of muslims deni that the crusades ever happened or it wasnt the muslims fault! ( im a christian not trying to be racist). I also learned in school that the pope was telling christians that if you fight you get forgiven, and the muslims were dehuminising the christians... thanx xxx.
AnswerChristian tradition tells us that Nero was the first emperor to throw Christians to the lions, however this is unlikely to be true.There may well have been instances when Christians were thrown to the lions and, if so, this would more likely have been during the Great Persecution of Emperor Diocletian, which began in 303 CE and lasted until 305 in the West, but continued until 311 in the East. Edward Gibbon ('The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'), discussing the problems in sorting fact from legend, says, "The scanty and suspicious materials of ecclesiastical history seldom enable us to dispel the dark cloud that hangs over the first age of the church."
There are no historical evidence that Jerusalem was ever the center of Christianity. Most activities of the early Christians happen in the country of St. Paul, in Turkey.
No. Suliman drove the crusaders out.
Christians live all over the world. In America Christians are free to worship when ever and where ever they want. In some other countries they are not allowed to worship in public, but there are still Christians all over the world.
For ever
permanent joints you have to break them off for them to be separated from what ever their on but semi permanent joints you can take of without breaking anything
Answer 1Judaism is the oldest monotheistic religion and Jerusalem has been its only holy site for 3000 years, ever since King Solomon built the original Jewish Temple there. All Jews who value their heritage feel ties to the holy land, where so many of their people struggled for the freedom to practice Judaism. At the same time, Jews believe that all people, Muslims, Jews, Christians, and everyone else should be welcome there, regardless of faith.Answer 2If we are talking about the political sharing of Jerusalem (as opposed to open access which is discussed above) the issue becomes very contentious in Jewish circles and there are about as many opinions as there are Jews. Some believe that Israel has no business exerting political control over the Old City and East Jerusalem, but this is a minority position. The main two positions are maintaining the current Law of Jerusalem which would keep Jerusalem an undivided city under Israeli control or a division of Jerusalem into West and East with some multinational or Israeli-led control of the Old City. In the Tabaa Summit, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak was willing to offer the Palestinian government complete control of the Old City provided Jewish freedom of access. This was an unpopular opinion in Israel and his party lost the subsequent elections. (The Palestinians rejected the plan on other grounds.)See the Related Link which shows the Geneva Initiative's discussion on a political division of Jerusalem.
Yes, they are antonyms. Temporary means for a short time and permanent means for long time/ for ever.
Yes, Jerusalem was divided from 1948 to 1967. In June of 1967, during the Six Day War, Israel occupied the entire city.
Indonesian Muslims never ever kill Christians. It was just a political war when Christians selected to be separated from main land Indonesia for political reasons.
Basically, only when calculating the day of "Easter".
NO! They would never do that. They are Christians and we never cuss! Never ever never!
I don't know specifically but I'm not aware that there's ever been a significant population of Buddhists is Jerusalem, so I suspect not. I may easily be mistaken.