0
The western states' stance on slavery varied significantly depending on the time period and specific state. In the early 19th century, territories like Missouri and Arkansas allowed slavery, while others, such as California and Oregon, adopted free-state policies. The debate over slavery in the West was a key factor leading to sectional tensions before the Civil War, as states sought to balance the interests of slave and free states. Overall, the western states were not uniformly supportive of slavery; their positions were shaped by economic, political, and social factors.
What else can I help you with?
Who wanted to allow slavery in the western states?
Proponents of allowing slavery in the western states included Southern politicians and slaveholders who sought to expand slavery into new territories acquired from the Mexican-American War and other sources. They believed that allowing slavery would promote economic growth and ensure the political power of slaveholding states. Key figures such as Senator John C. Calhoun advocated for the protection of slaveholding interests in these regions, arguing that it was essential for their way of life and economic interests.
How was the issue of slavery decided in the western states?
The expansion of the United States westward into newly acquired Mexican territories and other western territories caused a lot of controversy. The Mason-Dixon line was still the rule, but the controversy was when California, due to its climate where cotton and tobacco were unable to grow, entered the union as a free state, as slavery was unnecessary. The controversy was attempted to be put to rest by California agreeing to always having a pro-Slavery senator as to not have an anti-Slavery majority in the Senate. See the related link.
Was West for slavery during the civil war?
During the Civil War, the Western states and territories had diverse views on slavery. While some areas, particularly those in the Midwest, were largely anti-slavery and supported the Union, others, especially in the border states, maintained pro-slavery sentiments. The question of slavery in the West was complicated by issues of statehood and the expansion of slavery into new territories, leading to significant political and social tensions. Overall, the West was not uniformly for or against slavery but had a mix of perspectives reflecting the broader national conflict.
Did the West support Slavery?
yes, because they were beginning a new chapter in developing more states so the slaves would work the fields
How was slavery established in the Western Atlantic world?
fuvk
How did the western states feel about the issue of slavery?
Indifferent For A+
In what region did Breckenridge find support?
Breckenridge found support primarily in the southern and western regions of the United States, particularly among Democrats and those who aligned with his pro-slavery stance. His political base was strongest in states where slavery was deeply entrenched, as well as among constituents who favored the expansion of slavery into new territories. This support was crucial during his campaign for the presidency in 1860.
Whose goal was it to ban slavery in western territories?
It was the Wilmot Proviso that declared that there should be no slavery in the new states. This gained support in Congress, and by 1860 most Northerners agreed with it, while tolerating slavery in its traditional heartlands. That was how Lincoln got elected.
Did Adams have the support of the new western states?
There were no new western states under Adams.
Did the crittenden compromise fail?
The Crittenden Compromise failed because it outlawed slavery in western states because Abraham Lincoln opposed the western expansion of slavery.
The argument over slavery pitted States against States?
Yes, it did, and the majority of the conflict involved the north versus the south. But it should also be noted that back then, many states had slaves, and not just in the south. A number of mid-western states had decided to support slavery-- a good example was Missouri. And even states that were not officially slave states had pockets of slavery-- Illinois is a good example of this. There was considerable prejudice against blacks throughout Illinois, and as a result, no law was passed to officially outlaw slavery until 1848.
What two things did the Confederacy's constitution support?
states' rights and slavery
Was the Western United States for or against slavery?
Virginia was in favor of slavery due to their large plantations of tobacco.
Which presidential candidate completely opposed the spread of slavery in the western territories?
Abraham Lincoln, the Republican candidate in the 1860 presidential election, completely opposed the spread of slavery into the western territories. His stance was rooted in the belief that slavery was morally wrong and detrimental to the nation’s values. Lincoln's position rallied support from anti-slavery factions and played a crucial role in his election, ultimately influencing the course of the Civil War and the future of slavery in the United States.
What-Presidential candidate completely opposed the spread of slavery to western territories?
Abraham Lincoln completely opposed the spread of slavery to western territories.
What were the beliefs of the free soil party?
They opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories.Below is a link with more info.united-states-free-soil-party
What did James Kirke Paulding do to support his view of slavery?
He writted his book "Slavery in the United States" (1836) to express his view.
