The Muslim defenders soundly defeated the Christian crusaders who were attempting to capture Damascus. The crusaders returned to their homelands with the remnants of their armies, and that was the end of the Second Crusade.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
The Muslim defenders soundly defeated the Christian crusaders who were attempting to capture Damascus. The crusaders returned to their homelands with the remnants of their armies, and that was the end of the Second Crusade.
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
No in the second crusade.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
The First Crusade was highly successful, while the Second was not.
The second crusade was called in 1145 and ended in 1149. There is a link to an article on it below.
I tyink he answer to "who was the french leader of the second crusade" is Louis VII.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.
The fourth crusade that the Europeans were in control of constantinople at the end.
Well apparently it is called the noble crusade because everyone who went on the first crusade and the noble crusade were noble
You cannot end a Burning Crusade trial, but why would you need to?