answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The title or rank of emperor was supposed to pass from an emperor to his successor by inheritance. The old emperor would designate an heir to follow him. This was the ideal condition and it worked for the first dynasty, Caligula excepted. However, there were times when an emperor died unexpectedly without a designated heir and then there was intrigue, usually backed up by military force. There were also times when it was pure military force that brought a man to the rank of emperor.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the title of emperor pass from person in rome?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where and how do the patricians live?

A Patrician is a person of noble or high rank - the aristocracy of ancient Rome, a title conferred by the Emperor


What was the title of the first emperor of Rome?

Augustus ("the revered one").


What name did the first emperor of Rome take?

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.


Who ruled in Rome after emperor Vespasian?

After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.After emperor Vespasian, Rome was ruled by his son, the emperor Titus.


Who became the first emperor of Rome in 27 BC?

Rome's first emperor was Octavian, who was given the title Augustus. He is known to history as Caesar Augustus or Augustus Caesar.


What is the name of the third Roman Emperor?

The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.The third emperor of Rome was Caligula.


What was Charlemagne named after helping the pope defend Rome?

Charlemagne was given the title of Holy Roman Emperor.


Who was the person who set a fair government in rome?

Emperor Octavian Augustus.


Did the Frankish king Charlemagne receive the title of pope in appreciation for his help in protecting Rome from invasion?

No, Charlemagne was given the title of Holy Roman Emperor.


Who was the first empier of Rome?

The first emperor of Rome was Octavian Caesar, who was given the title Augustus. Since that time he was known as Caesar Augustus or simply Augustus.


Who was the 13th Emperor of Rome?

Trajan was the 13th emperor of Rome


What emperor ruled Rome in 400 b c?

No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.No emperor ruled Rome in 400 BC. In that year Rome was a republic, not a principate.