There can be a whole range of outcomes. Their areas, or part of them, might be taken over by another empire. When an empire collapses due to invasions by several peoples, the lands of the empire might be carved into kingdoms of the invading peoples (as in the case of the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire). Conquered areas which are no longer under the rule of the empire might start wars against each other (as in the Balkan Peninsula when countries were created after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. With the collapse of the central power of the empire, the empire might fall prey to warlords and descend into military anarchy until a new central power and empire is created (as with the collapse of the Chinese dynasties). These are just a few examples.
Some of the lasting accomplishments of the Umayyad and Abbasid empires were religious freedom, lower taxes, and the geographical growth of the caliphate.
They Started Conquering all of what was the Rome and Greek empires. As the Empires were coming to an end.
Both empires grew too large to protect.
This question is very broad. There have been many dozens of empires in history and each one of them had different weaknesses.
Both the Roman and British empires influenced the regions of their worlds that they conquered or occupied. Both empires introduced their laws and cultural values the empires had. Both empires also recruited members of these regions to become part of their military forces.
It did because they were not good empires
Its defeat and takeover by Alexander the great.
The empires that fell were the roman empire since they fell in 407 Ad
Military problems an political issues
The Russian Empire, The Austro-Hungarian Empire and The German Empire
marshal plan
as all empires of that era are destined to fall, the Byzantines would fall right after it great conquest and economy collapse only to be save by the next empire.
some empires in Mesopotamia are Babylon,Akkad,and the Chaldean empire
JACQUELINE HAYDEN has written: 'COLLAPSE OF COMMUNIST POWER IN POLAND: STRATEGIC MISPERCEPTIONS AND UNANTICIPATED OUTCOMES'
Revolt or economic collapse as shown by the empires of the past where the leader did have that exact power.
they were people but empires, you see, in Egypt the Empires were most powerful then anyone, this meant that they could do what ever they liked, except for when it came to the law in some places. Some Empires made their own law and some had to go by the others law, which didn't make them as, EMPIRE, of all only some,( meaning all the slaves and others they were not Empires).
Greek, Roman, Ottoman, British are some empires in succeeding order (there are others).