The renewed debate over slavery in the West was primarily fueled by the westward expansion of the United States and the question of whether new territories should allow slavery. The acquisition of lands through events like the Mexican-American War intensified these discussions, as both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions sought to influence the status of slavery in these regions. This conflict was further exacerbated by the introduction of the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed settlers to decide on the legality of slavery, leading to violent confrontations known as "Bleeding Kansas." Ultimately, these tensions contributed significantly to the political and social divisions that escalated into the Civil War.
The extension of slavery was not caused by the Civil War; rather, the Civil War was a consequence of the deepening divide over slavery's expansion into new territories and states. Debates surrounding the Missouri Compromise, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and other legislative efforts highlighted the tensions between free and slave states. Ultimately, the conflict over slavery's role in American society contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861.
how did washington view on slavery evolved over time
The western states' stance on slavery varied significantly depending on the time period and specific state. In the early 19th century, territories like Missouri and Arkansas allowed slavery, while others, such as California and Oregon, adopted free-state policies. The debate over slavery in the West was a key factor leading to sectional tensions before the Civil War, as states sought to balance the interests of slave and free states. Overall, the western states were not uniformly supportive of slavery; their positions were shaped by economic, political, and social factors.
Kansas became a battleground over the slavery question due to the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This led to significant migration of both pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers into Kansas, resulting in violent clashes known as "Bleeding Kansas." The conflict highlighted the deep national divisions over slavery and foreshadowed the larger national crisis that would culminate in the Civil War.
Slavery goes back as far as History not only in West Africa but all over the world and it is still with us.
The main constitutional arguements during the debate over slavery were representation in Congress, importation of slaves, and the Bill of Rights.
Some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery include humanitarian results. For example, when people treat others fairly, all will be educated and respected and slavery will stop growing.
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were the two participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858.
Republican
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
Stephen A. Douglas
to abolish it
Admitting California into the Union in 1850 gave raise over the debate over slavery. It was against Federal law of the confederacy to harbor slaves in free states.
The Missouri Compromise temporarily settled the debate over slavery by allowing Missouri enter the Union as a slave state. Maine was allowed to enter the Union as a free state.
The Missouri Compromise temporarily settled the debate over slavery by allowing Missouri enter the Union as a slave state. Maine was allowed to enter the Union as a free state.
A possible result of the growing sectional debate over slavery would be states seceding.
Virginia legislature