In most legends, Athur lived in the 6th century, but some people believe Arthur was alive in either the 12th century or 16th.
King Arthur is a legendary British leader who, according to medieval histories and romances, led the defence of Britain against Saxon invaders in the early sixth century. The details of Arthur's story are mainly composed of folklore and literary invention, and his historical existence is debated and disputed by modern historians. The sparse historical background of Arthur is gleaned from various sources, including the Annales Cambriae, the Historia Brittonum, and the writings of Gildas. Arthur's name also occurs in early poetic sources such as Y Gododdin.
Around the 5th century...the era when King Arthur was around...
If he did live, it would have been somewhere in 500-600 AD
King Arthur's best knight was Lancelot
King Arthur is a legendary figure, and the exact duration of his reign over Camelot is not definitively established in historical texts. Various legends and stories suggest that he ruled for around 15 to 20 years, but these accounts are often inconsistent and mythical in nature. Additionally, the concept of Camelot itself is more symbolic than historical, representing an idealized version of Arthur's rule rather than a specific timeline.
king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
December 21st King Arthur was born in the 4th to the 5th century
Antonia Pakenham did not write a book about King Arthur. Antonia Fraser wrote "The King Arthur" in 1970, but it is about the historical figure rather than the legendary King Arthur.
Some time in the mid to late fifth century. If the historical basis for the Arthur legend is the British leader Riothomus, then his dates are probably about 455 to 470.
ntheearertty
There is limited historical evidence to prove the existence of King Arthur as a historical figure. Much of what is known about him comes from medieval legends and folklore rather than concrete historical records. Some historians believe that King Arthur was a composite figure or that his story is based on legends of multiple historical figures.
There is no concrete historical evidence to prove that King Arthur was a real living person. The stories of King Arthur are largely based on folklore, legends, and myths rather than documented historical accounts.
king arthur is known for helping the defence against the attack of the saxons in the 6th century.
There is no concrete historical evidence that proves King Arthur was a real person. The stories of King Arthur are largely based on myth and legend, with some scholars suggesting that he may have been a composite of multiple historical figures. The lack of reliable contemporary records and the fantastical elements of the Arthurian legend make it difficult to establish the existence of a historical King Arthur.
There is no conclusive historical evidence to prove if King Arthur was a real historical figure or a legendary character. The stories of King Arthur and his knights are primarily found in medieval folklore and literature. Some historians believe that King Arthur may have been based on a real person or amalgamation of multiple historical figures, but this remains a subject of debate and speculation.
the story of King Arthur was a legend. The story is not associated with a specific century.
there were no hospitals in the 12th century