Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
Roman clothing was identical for both rich and poor. However the wealthy could afford to have their clothes made of more refined materials such as very fine wool, silk or cotton while the poorer people had to settle for the coarser wools. The wealthy could also afford to have their fabrics dyed in various colors which the poor could not.
You need to clarify what you mean by rich religion.
Rich Romans lived in their houses and slept in their beds.
They have citizenship, which places them in a privileged relationship with non-citizens.
rich people could serve
IF they were rich they would live outside the citites.
In Britain the rich Romans came and took over the Celt's.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
very rich
Rich Romans lived in their houses and slept in their beds.
rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces
rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces
The Romans did not have a problem with people getting rich. Greed and corruption were massive and notorious. An enterprising freedman could also get rich. Rich Romans liked to flaunt their wealth with opulent houses, statues to themselves and the like.
The Romans were richer than the Vikings.
slaves
rome became rich when the Romans invaded it.
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
Patricians
Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.