0
What else can I help you with?
What do historians believe about the founding of rome?
by Remus and Romulus ++ That's the legend. I doubt historians believe it!
What sources are used by historians to study past?
Historians use a variety of sources to study the past, including primary sources like letters, diaries, official documents, and photographs, which provide firsthand accounts of historical events. Secondary sources, such as books, articles, and documentaries, offer interpretations and analyses based on primary data. Additionally, historians may utilize archaeological evidence, oral histories, and material culture to gain a more comprehensive understanding of historical contexts and experiences.
How do historians divided the pasts into periods?
Historians divide the past into periods to create a structured framework for studying and understanding historical developments. These divisions are often based on significant events, cultural shifts, technological advancements, or social changes, such as the transition from the ancient to the medieval period. The use of defined time frames, like the Renaissance or the Industrial Revolution, helps historians analyze patterns, draw comparisons, and contextualize historical narratives. Such categorization also aids in organizing educational curricula and guiding research methodologies.
Who organized trade in the medieval times?
Trade was organized primarily by tradesmen's guilds. The organization was influenced to a degree by laws and taxes, but these were usually fairly simple, and not as detailed as guild regulations. Often, laws were enacted at the request of guilds or groups of merchants. For example, a king's decision of which villages would get town charters, was commonly based on advice from the merchants and tradesmen, who would benefit or find themselves having more competition based on where the towns were positioned.
How have recent historians changed the way people view history?
Historians of today and those of the past base their writings on many factors, one unfortunately is a bias they may or may not be aware of. One thing is a certainty, all historians have a cultural background that differs in many ways from one another. Clearly there will be different views of various past events depending on a variety of factors. Historians of today's Russia will have different views of the history of the Soviet Union, depending upon their political bias or lack of them. The ordinary person, one without a political or cultural bias will now as in the past, believe the "history" that best suits themselves. Of course, there is no consensus of how people of any particular period of time, viewed history. There are too many variables, too many different peoples, too many different time periods. What is clear today as it has always been, historians have written different versions of the same periods of time and events. There can be no proven way to determine if recent historians have changed the way people view history. This is true if only based on intellectual thought. There can be no "proof" for lack of a better term that anything has changed because the historians of today have the same views, accurate or inaccurate today as in the past. Any historian or student of history will agree to that,.
Which of the following historians has organized her study of the pass based on the category period?
Which method will best help you determine whether or not a secondary source is conclusion is valid?
Which of the following historians has organized her study of the past based on the category "period"?
(Apex) A historian studies each of the major world powers between the years 100 BCE and 100 CE.
Which of the followinfg historians has organized her study of the past based on the category region?
Fernand Braudel is a historian who organizes his study of the past based on the category of region, particularly in his work "The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II." He focuses on the Mediterranean region and its interconnected history during the 16th century.
What historians has organized her organized her study of the past based on the category theme?
One historian who organized her study of the past based on the category theme was Annales School historian Fernand Braudel. He emphasized long-term social and economic structures, focusing on themes like geography, climate, and material life to understand historical development. His approach contributed to the establishment of interdisciplinary historical studies.
What historians has organized her study of the past based on the category theme?
Historians often organize their studies of the past based on thematic categories such as social, economic, political, cultural, and environmental history. One notable example is historian Eric Hobsbawm, who analyzed the history of the 19th and 20th centuries through the lens of social and economic transformations. Similarly, historians like Fernand Braudel have emphasized the importance of geographical and environmental factors in shaping historical developments. By using themes, historians can provide a more nuanced understanding of complex historical narratives.
What historians has organized her study of the study of the past based on the category region?
One prominent historian who has organized her study of the past based on the category of region is Susan M. Reverby. She has focused on the regional contexts of health and medicine, particularly examining how social factors and regional histories shape public health narratives. By analyzing specific regions, Reverby highlights the interplay between local histories and broader national trends, providing a nuanced understanding of historical developments. Her work emphasizes the importance of regional studies in enriching our comprehension of the past.
What historians organized her study of the past based on the category theme?
Historians often organize their study of the past based on thematic categories such as economics, politics, culture, and society. This thematic approach allows for a deeper understanding of how different aspects of human experience interact and influence one another over time. Notable historians who have utilized thematic organization include Eric Hobsbawm, who focused on social and economic themes, and Howard Zinn, who emphasized class struggles and social movements. By categorizing historical events and trends thematically, historians can uncover broader patterns and insights that might be overlooked in a strictly chronological narrative.
What is stopping euthanasia from becoming legal?
Opposition from religious based, highly funded and organized lobbies.Opposition from religious based, highly funded and organized lobbies.Opposition from religious based, highly funded and organized lobbies.Opposition from religious based, highly funded and organized lobbies.
Which statement is true about the social category in which many freed slaves found themselves in the years following the Civil War?
It was based on ascribed status.
What historians organize their study of the past based on the category region?
Historians who organize their study of the past based on region are often referred to as regional historians. They focus on the historical developments, cultures, and events specific to a particular geographic area, such as countries, continents, or even smaller locales. This approach allows them to analyze the unique social, political, and economic factors that shape a region's history, often drawing comparisons with other regions to highlight differences and similarities. Examples include historians specializing in African history, European history, or Asian studies.
Science is organized into branches based on what?
Science is organized into branches based on a great many things. These branches could be based on chemical make up for example.
How are landfills organized?
It is based on theory.
