The Roman government had no problem with Jesus. In fact, they didn't even know who he was. Proof of this is in the New Testament, when they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. Pilate didn't want to execute him but his hand was forced by the Jewish priests who were threatening civil unrest.
ITS B. TRUST ME ITS B. i got it wrong and it showed the correct answer
Yes, he was able to dig the roman empire away from their trust issues.
Well I actually know the answer to this question because I know two slaves that were around under his reign. Yes their dead now, kind of, but you just gotta trust me. He wasn't gay exactly. But he defiantly was bi-sexual. Also he was into bestiality, animals / animal skins. He was also into incest, doing many things to his mother.
john william
Over generations the freed slaves diluted the national identity of Roman citizenship, the Welfare State exhausted the Treasury, currency debasement followed by declining morals, official corruption, spiralling the Empire downward. Recall the citizens' demand "bread and circus to the Roman people"? Today the Gladiators are hockey, football, baseball, basketball players, similarly diverting attention and resources from meaningful activities, education, production, the foundation of maintaining a healthy economy. High cost luxury imports coupled with fewer exports to the heathens always results in a trade deficit. (See Washington's or any other imperial eco-policy)! Also, today's corrupt politicos are not murdered but retired with indexed pensions. There is no more deterrent. (See madoff "restricted" to his luxury penthouse). A natural disaster played a significant role in the crumbling of large stone structures, such as the Colosseum, the Forum, etc, disrupting orderly administration, ushering in the Dark Ages. I trust this adequately describes the problems then and now.
The white peoples government had betrayed the Indians too many times before and the Indians didnt want to trust them again
The same things as government everywhere: some trust and a lot of money.
they didnt trust each other, after all they had debatedly opposite forms of government
in the 20 century they wanated to get back at people because they didnt trust them
Either they do not trust your message or they do not trust Jesus'.
bkuss he didnt
'Tis So Sweet to Trust in Jesus was created in 1989.
Jesus is amazing. end of story.
they didnt trust the chinese so they added more foreigners to the government. most chinese scholars became teachers
Yes.
"Iniuulat ko na si Hesus ay aking pagtitiwala."
64% trust their government, while 36% do not.