primary sources and secondary sources.
They use primary and secondary sources
primary and secondary sources.
There are three categories for historians and their source material: Primary: ancient historians existed at the time of the event Secondary: ancient historians existed after the event and analysed/used primary sources modern: Modern historaians who use either of the above majority of the primary sources do not criticize Augustus and idolize him, in contrast some secondary sources like Tacitus hate Augustus Overall however it is agreed(by many modern historians) that Augustus was emperor because of his freinds Marcus vipsanius Agrippa and Gaius Maecanus. The primary sources(historians) were either sychophantic or terrified of persecution by Augustus, the Secondary sources are also biased because they were hired by patrons with vested interests in Augustus's depiction. In short thereare a range of views all with their own bias.
Cross-checking sources against other evidence. However, there's no 'patent recipe' for dealing with problems of bias in sources.
Because people who write memoirs, tend to adjust the facts to show themselves in a better light.
To develop a deeper understanding of the past by using sources
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
primary sources and secondary sources.
Sound generalizations can accommodate a variety of complex sources.
historians use primary soucres and secondary sources
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Frequently, they also take advantage of the work of other historians by using other secondary sources.
determine wheter an assertion made by one source is likely to be true
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions