0
Some people argue that "Hamlet" should be in the Western canon because it explores timeless themes such as revenge, madness, mortality, and the complexity of human nature. The play's rich character development and intricate plot structure have had a profound influence on literature and drama, shaping narrative techniques and character archetypes in subsequent works. Additionally, Shakespeare's masterful use of language and poetic devices continues to resonate with audiences, making "Hamlet" a quintessential example of literary excellence in the Western tradition.
What else can I help you with?
What is the reason why some might argue that hamlet should be included in the western canon?
There are a few reasons why some might fuss over hamlet should be in the western canon. The main reason would be the work had appeal across cultures.
Are there any communist countries in the western hemisphere?
Only Cuba. Some might argue that Venezuela is, but legally, it's not.
Who primary goal was the removal of all western ideas from Muslim nations?
The primary goal of movements and figures advocating for the removal of Western ideas from Muslim nations often stems from a desire to preserve traditional Islamic values and cultural identity. This perspective is commonly associated with various Islamist groups and leaders who argue that Western influence undermines religious and social norms. Notable examples include figures like Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran, whose revolution aimed to establish an Islamic state free from Western imperialism and secularism. Such movements seek to promote a return to what they perceive as authentic Islamic principles and practices, resisting globalization and Western cultural dominance.
Fall of Rome in 500 AD and 800 AD?
The fall of Rome is usually considered to have occurred in 476 A.D. when the Western Empire was taken over by the barbarian King Odacer. Emperor of the Eastern Empire (Xeno) recognized Odacer as a legitimate ruler of the Western Empire therefore causing a debate of Rome's actual "fall."As for falling in 800 AD, I suppose one could argue it "fell again" (the western empire) when Charlemagne was crowned Emperor of Rome (in 800 AD). Although there was already a crowned emperor of the western Roman empire at the time, Pope Leo III decided to crown him anyway. This I guess this could be a reason someone would be able to argue that Rome fell again. I personally think the point in which it started to slowly deteriorate was in the aforementioned date 476 B.C. thus causing it to die out slowly as oppose to an exact date in which it "fell."I'm no historian, just a history student and I hope this may help even if it is just a little bit. I'd site more sources, but I don't think you would care to look at the exact source I did because most sources give the facts that I gave.
What is the donatist controversy?
An event that took place in the 4/5th century in Rome. Some Christians bent to the will of Diocletian during the great persecution and the Donatists didn't think that those people's faith was valid any longer. There was controversy over who should be bishop of Carthage. So they sent representatives to Rome to argue their case but Constantine ruled that they were wrong. They still wouldn't give up so Constantine persecuted them, but that just made them martyrs.
What is the reason why some might argue that hamlet should be included in the western canon?
There are a few reasons why some might fuss over hamlet should be in the western canon. The main reason would be the work had appeal across cultures.
Which is a reason why some might argue that Hamlet should be included in the Western canon?
It has had broad appeal across many cultures for more than 400 years.
Why would some might argue that Hamlet should be included in the Western canon?
It has had broad appeal across many cultures for more than 400 years.
Why do some people say hydrogen should be above lithium Li and others argue that it should be above fluorine F?
Some people say hydrogen should be above lithium (Li) and others argue that it should be above fluorine (F) because it has a valence shell that only accepts two electrons.
Is it healthy if you and your boyfriend argue a lot?
Of course not. It depends what you argue about though. There is a very fine line between argument and debates. Often people argue about different tastes in things like music when they should just debate it.
What did Martin Luther king Jr letter from Birmingham jail argue?
people should disobey unjust laws~apex
What did Martin Luther king letter from Birmingham jail argue?
People should resist unfair laws.
Should cars have speed limits?
Yeah... People need speed limits to know the correct speed to drive, some people may argue that people will know what speed they should drive at, but what about people who are new?
Hamlet did the right thing?
Whether Hamlet did the right thing is a matter of interpretation. Some argue that his quest for revenge against King Claudius was justified, as Claudius murdered Hamlet's father and usurped the throne. However, Hamlet's indecision and the resulting tragedy lead to the deaths of many innocent characters, suggesting that his actions had far-reaching negative consequences. Ultimately, Hamlet's moral struggle highlights the complexity of justice and revenge, leaving the question open to debate.
Is Ophelia guilty of any of the womanly sins of which Hamlet accuses her in Hamlet?
There's little evidence that she is. Part of Hamlet's rant is purely misogynistic, though, and would apply to all women, so in that sense she can't help but be guilty. Some interpretations do argue that the two of them have slept together, or that she's been trying to seduce or tempt him.
Why does your boyfriend argue with you then with the people who cause us problems?
There are two interpretations of your question: 1. Why does my boyfriend argue with me first and then argue with the people who cause us problems? 2. Why does my boyfriend argue with me rather than with the people who cause us problems? Which is it?
How do I argue against the statement 'Soft drinks should be banned' for a debate?
You can argue that people should have the freedom to purchase whatever legal beverages they want. People are responsible for exercising their own self control by limiting how much soda they drink, but there shouldn't be a ban that limits their freedom to choose what they drink.
