Nuclear power plant fuel cells are functional for approximately 5-7 years, so in the first year, there will be only low-level waste (not the dangerous stuff you think of when you hear "nuclear waste"). After the 5-7 years of the fuel cells, they all would be considered waste, and it all depends on the size of the power plant. A typical size power plan produces 27MWd of electricity, running on 105 tons of fuel, so after those 5-7 years, you would have 105 tons of the high-level waste, but would have generated (27MWd*365.25 days*7 years*1000 kW/24 hours) = 1.659 billion kWh.
For reference, 105 tons of coal would produce roughly 210 million kWh, or 0.21 billion kWh - only 12.5% of the energy, and coal would still produce it's own waste that is much harder to manage as coal is burned and therefore the waste is in the form of a gas.
popcicles
No. There are several problems with nuclear energy - mainly, managing the waste products - and as a result, there are many protests against the user of nuclear energy.
More radioactive waste products to store safely
water
Nuclear Energy
Nuclear waste. Consumable Energy. Heat.
Nuclear energy generates radioactive waste in the form of spent nuclear fuel, which contains radioactive isotopes. This waste must be stored and managed properly due to its long-term hazardous nature.
Nuclear Energy produces radioactive waste because if there isnt any sign of nuclear waste/energy in the sullotion/object then it wouldnt be counted as 'Radioactive'.
Nuclear waste products can leave isotopes that contaminate the environment and cause heath problems.
No, it is not.
Nuclear
The products of nuclear fission are typically two or more smaller nuclei, along with the release of energy in the form of gamma radiation and kinetic energy of the fission fragments. Fission of a heavy nucleus can also produce neutrons, which can go on to induce further fission reactions in a chain reaction.