0
What else can I help you with?
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
What is the difference between formal and informal research techniques?
Formal research techniques are structured, systematic, and follow a specific methodology, such as surveys, experiments, or case studies. Informal research techniques are more unstructured and rely on personal observations, experiences, or interactions for gathering information, such as interviews or focus groups. Formal research tends to be quantitative, while informal research is often qualitative in nature.
What is the difference between a research schedule and research questionnaire?
Research schedule are being filled by the enumerators who are specially appointed for this purpose. Research questionnaire in technical term is the set of questions which is mailed to the responded, responded will send the filled questionnair. sudhish
What is the difference between primary and secodary research?
Primary research involves collecting data directly from original sources through methods like surveys or experiments, while secondary research involves gathering information from existing sources like books or articles. Primary research is more time-consuming and expensive but offers firsthand insights, while secondary research is quicker and less costly but may not address specific research needs as directly.
What is the difference between a research report and an essay?
A research report is a formal document that presents findings from original research, often including data and analysis. An essay, on the other hand, is a more flexible form of writing that presents an argument or viewpoint on a topic, supported by evidence or reasoning. Research reports tend to be more structured and objective, while essays allow for more creativity and expression of personal perspectives.
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Is deductive or inductive research more applicable to policy formulation and policy evaluation?
Inductive research is more applicable to policy formulation and policy evaluation.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?
Normative deductive approach starts with a theory and uses deduction to derive hypotheses, while inductive approach starts with observations and uses induction to formulate a theory. The deductive approach is useful when researchers have a strong theoretical foundation and want to test specific hypotheses, while the inductive approach is useful when exploring new areas where little theory exists. The usefulness of each approach depends on the research question and context.
What are Strengths and weaknesses of deductive and inductive research approaches?
Inductive research approaches are more widely used than Deductive by the scientific community, but they both have there strength and weaknesses. Inductive method: -Strengths: The inductive method produces concrete conclusions about nature that are backed by a variety of observational evidence. When one of an inductive arguments premises are perceived as false, other observational evidence can be added to the premises to save the argument, this is not the case with deductive reasoning. -Weaknesses: The inductive method produces conclusions that go beyond what there premises warrant. In other words, inductive arguments take a limited amount of observations to provide a universal conclusion, which could still be false. For example, someone observes 10,000 dogs and finds that they all have flees, then inductively concludes that all dogs have flees. This is a situation where overwhelming observational evidence (10,000 dogs have flees) points to an inductively reasoned false conclusion (All dogs have flees). Deductive Method: -Strengths: Deductive reasoning dosent require painstakingly observing a variety of observational evidence to reach a conclusion. One can start off with a generally accepted axiom, or statement, and deduce conclusions based on that axiom. -Weaknesses: Deductive reasoning can make permanent the logical fallacies we have today. In other words, if you use an axiom to deduce a variety of conclusions, and that axiom turns out to be false, all of the conclusions following that axiom are false as a result. hope this helps!
Why is inductive and deductive different?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning starts with general premises to reach a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning is based on probability and can lead to new insights or theories, whereas deductive reasoning is more focused on validating existing theories or arguments. Both types of reasoning play important roles in research and problem solving.
Is qualitative research a deductive process?
Qualitative research is typically considered an inductive process rather than a deductive one. It involves exploring and understanding complex phenomena through open-ended inquiries, often leading to the development of theories based on the data collected. While some qualitative studies may use deductive reasoning to test specific hypotheses, the primary focus is on generating insights and themes from the data, which aligns more with inductive reasoning.
Is it false Forming a hypothesis is accomplished through inductive reasoning?
No, it is not false. Forming a hypothesis often involves inductive reasoning, where specific observations lead to general conclusions or predictions. However, hypotheses can also be formulated through deductive reasoning, where general principles are applied to predict specific outcomes. Both reasoning approaches can play a role in hypothesis formation in scientific research.
What statement best describes deductive reasoning?
moving from general conclusions to specific observations
Difference between deductive and inductive research with example?
Inductive research starts off with specific observations and move toward general ideas or theory to capture what they show. (Qualitative) Deductive Research starts with a general idea or theory and then moves to test it by looking at specific observations. (Quantitative)
What type of reasoning does qualitative research use?
Qualitative research primarily uses inductive reasoning, which involves starting with specific observations or data points and then developing general conclusions or theories based on those observations. This approach allows researchers to explore deeper meanings, perspectives, and relationships within their data.
How do inductie and deductive reasoning apply to forming a hypothesis?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on observations, leading to the formation of a hypothesis. Deductive reasoning involves starting with a general hypothesis and making specific predictions that can be tested. Both types of reasoning are important in forming and testing hypotheses in scientific research.
Research that is guided by a hypothesis is called?
deductive
