Reagan challenges Gorbachev to demonstrate the sincerity of his reforms by urging him to take concrete actions that go beyond mere rhetoric. He emphasizes the need for genuine reductions in nuclear arsenals and the establishment of democratic freedoms in Eastern Europe. By framing the dialogue around verifiable actions rather than empty promises, Reagan seeks to hold Gorbachev accountable and ensure that reforms lead to meaningful change. This approach pressures Gorbachev to substantiate his claims with tangible results.
at first, then no
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall."
Reagan and Gorbachev held four summits together.
After Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in 1985, Ronald Reagan's approach toward the USSR shifted toward a more diplomatic and conciliatory stance. Recognizing Gorbachev's reforms, such as Glasnost (openness) and Perestroika (restructuring), Reagan engaged in arms reduction negotiations, resulting in the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. This marked a significant thaw in U.S.-Soviet relations, as Reagan began to view Gorbachev as a partner in reducing nuclear tensions rather than simply an adversary. Overall, the interaction shifted from confrontation to collaboration, paving the way for the eventual end of the Cold War.
Gorbachev was in the Soviet union, the strategic defense initiative, nicknamed star wars, was an American project. But at treaty talks between the two superpowers, Gorbachev told Reagan he would agree to sign only if Reagan and the U.S. trashed the project. Reagan refused.
I think it is Gorbachev
Yes, President Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev played crucial roles in ending the Cold War through their diplomatic engagement and willingness to negotiate. Their summits in the 1980s, particularly the Reykjavik Summit in 1986, fostered significant arms reduction agreements and improved relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Both leaders recognized the need for change, with Gorbachev's reforms in the Soviet Union and Reagan’s shift from a hardline stance to dialogue, ultimately paving the way for the Cold War's conclusion.
The reforms that led to democratization of the Soviet Union were begun by Gorbachev because the Soviet Union was near bankruptcy, and capitalism meant more money for them. Pope John Paul and Ronald Reagan also had some responsibility for the democratization.
In a Photo with Gorbachev, George H. Bush, and Ronald Reagan one can gather some insight to Gorbachev's height. George H. Bush towers over both Reagan and Gorbachev, however, Reagan is slightly leaned over, but so is Bush. If George H. Bush is about 6'2" or 6'3" and Reagan is somewhere near the 6' or 6'1" mark, one can comfortably place Mikhail Gorbachev at around 5'9" to 5'10". Mikhail Gorbachev: 5'10" I used this picture to draw my conclusions http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Reagan_Bush_Gorbachev_in_New_York_1988.jpg
The original challenge of actually tearing down the wall, came from US President, Ronald Reagan. In 1987, President Reagan made a speech in front of the Brandenburg Gate, (now referred to as the "Tear Down This Wall Speech".) at the Berlin wall, in which he challenged then Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev to "tear down this wall". At the time this speech was delivered, few believed that the wall would actually be destroyed. President Reagan's challenge to Gorbachev to "tear down this wall" was in direct response to Gorbachev's policy of perestroika. Reagan felt that Gorbachev needed to follow through with actual changes, and not simply "HEAR" about reform, and openness, and policy change.Two years later, when the wall was finally destroyed in 1989, many in East Germany and West Germany, wanted the wall destroyed.A LOT of people had that idea.
President Reagan
Easy example from the joke archives of the Cold war: Reagan and Gorbachev ran a race. Reagan came first, Gorbachev came second. American media reported that Reagan beat Gorbachev, showing true American competitive spirit. Soviet media reported: President Gorbachev secured a wonderful silver medal. Reagan came next-to-last. Both true. The sad on the funny, you see it too often.