Short answer: Stalin Long answer: At the time of Lenin's death there were a few prominent party leaders that all could have potentially seized power. They are Stalin, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Trotsky. Lenin's final testament labeled Trotsky as his preferred successor, however this was never released to the public. Seeing Trotsky also as the most popular member (also with the army behind him), he was dubbed the biggest threat by Stalin and an alliance was formed between Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev to take down Trotsky. This was successful and Trotsky lost most power, his influence and eventually was exiled between 1928 - 1930 (just going off of memory). Stalin was the most adequate leader and maneuvered himself within the alliance of Kamenev and Zionoviev to become the prominent party member. Both of these men would later end up date, certainly at the behest of Stalin.
Nikita Khrushchev
Nikita Khrushchev led the Soviet Union, serving as the First Secretary of the Communist Party from 1953 to 1964 and as Premier from 1958 to 1964. He is known for his role in de-Stalinization, promoting a policy of peaceful coexistence with the West, and for significant events during the Cold War, including the Cuban Missile Crisis. His leadership marked a period of political and social change within the USSR.
Nikita Khrushchev became the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union after Stalin died. The General Secretary's position was the real seat of power in the Soviet Union at the time. In that sense only can it be logically said that Khrushchev "lead communism" after Stalin died. It would be incorrect to say that he "lead communism," because "communism" existed in several other countries and neither Stalin nor Khrushchev lead those countries. One could say that Nikita Khrushchev lead communism in the Soviet Union in particular, but not that he lead communism in general.
Josef Stalin continued to lead the Communists in Europe till he died, after which Khrushchev took over from him.
Yes, Nikita Khrushchev is often quoted as suggesting that the United States would ultimately destroy itself from within, rather than through external conflict. He believed that internal societal issues, such as capitalism and class struggle, would lead to its downfall. This sentiment reflects his broader views on the strengths and weaknesses of capitalism compared to communism. However, the exact phrasing and context of his statements may vary in different accounts.
No, Lenin had died in 1924 and the Cold War did not begin till after WWII.
in 1956, three years after Stalin died, party secretary khruschev gave a secret speech to the assembled communist party congress that condemned Stalin for being a tyrant. though it was secret, news did leak out, leading many to think that a period of reform was brewing. in Hungary, reformists took the lead and staged the beginnings of a revolution. soviet policy, however, had not changed that much and the revolution was crushed.
Formed by Bolsheviks lead by Lenin after the revolution in Russia, which happened in 25. october, 1917. USSR broke in 1991.
His idea of making the USSR democratic, didn't help him with popularity but it did eventually lead to the unintentional fall of communism in Eastern Europe.
it mad him mad
Improve it please. Nikita Khrushchev AS HE STATED WENT INTO CUBA AS A RESULT OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S "COMING OFF AS WEAK" DURING THEIR "GENEVA SUMMIT" IT MAY WELL HAVE BEEN SO KENNEDY WAS TAKING A MIXTURE OF DRUGS... INCLUDING "SPEED" FACT BEING HE BROUGHT WITH HIM FAMED "DR, FEEL_GOOD"! HE WAS BEING INJECTED!THIS HELPED LEAD TO Nikita Khrushchev BECOMING "ADVENTUROUS" AS THE USSR WAS FAIRLY WELL "SURROUNDED BY U.S. MISSILES AND WHAT THE THEN PREMIER SAW, WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS AN OPENING... HE STARTED SENDING IN THE MISSILES TO CUBA..... WITH A OH SO WELCOMING CUBAN LEADER CASTRO!WHEN THE U.S. FOUND HOW FAR EVENTS HAD GONE, WELL IT WAS ALREADY "CRUNCH TIME"! KENNEDY (NOT KNOWN AS A "GREAT DIPLOMAT" SET UP A WHITE HOUSE UNIT CALLED X-COM! THINGS BECAME VERY "TOUCH AND GO"! KENNEDY WAS NOT HURT BY THE FACT THAT THE U.S. HAD A LARGE MISSILE ADVANTAGE! STILL IF A WAR WAS SET OFF IT WOULD HAVE BEEN DISASTROUS FINALLY AFTER A "NAVAL QUARANTINE" BUT REALLY TENSIONS AND "PULLING BACK FROM THE BRINK" CAME AS WE MADE A "SECRET DEAL..... NEVER TO INVADE CUBA, OR HELP ANYONE ELSE" ALSO WE GAVE AWAY, IN A MOVE THAT WAS TO BE "KEPT SECRET" JUPIER MISSLES IN TURKEY IN ABOUT 6 MONTHS, IF THE USSR PULLED OUT ALL MISSLES IN CUBA! SO BASICALLY IT WAS A TRADE, BUT BOTH COUNTRIES WERE ALLOWED TO LIVE ON!!AN INTERESTING AND INDEED SCARY CAVEAT IN A SHOW CALLED "FOG OF WAR" WITH PRES. KENNEDY'S SECREAITARY OF DEFENCE ROBERT S. McNAMMAR, HE DESCUSED THE CRISIS...... MOST WERE KNOWN FACTS, BUT THREE! ONE THE USSR HAD "CONVENTIAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS THESE IN THEMESELVE IF WE HAD TRIED, A SUGJESTED AIR AND TROOP INVASIONOF CUBA, WOULD HAVE SET OFF WW3! TWO CASTRO, EVEN KNOWING IT WOULD BE THE END OF CUBA,,,AND MUCH OF THE WORLD, BEGGED THE SOVIET PRIMIER TO "LAUNCH THE MISSLES" #3 WITH SO MANY PEOPLE CREDITING KENNEDY FOR "HIS GREAT JOB" HE SAID, "WE WERE SAVD,BY PURE LUCK" GULP!! DON
Joseph Stalin, who lead the USSR and was the cause of many countries to be dictated.