A nation may be justified in imposing its will on others in situations of humanitarian intervention, such as preventing genocide or gross human rights violations. Additionally, self-defense against aggression or threats may warrant intervention. However, such actions should ideally be supported by international law and consensus to avoid unilateralism and ensure legitimacy. Ultimately, the justification hinges on the intent, methods, and consequences of the intervention.
a group of nations ruled by a single person or government
I am pretty sure that it is an embargo
sanctions
The word you are looking for is probably "embargo."
The agreement is called Embargo.
A group of advisers, usually for a nation's leader, is often called a(n):
an example of the tyranny of a faction imposing its will on the rest of the nation
An Embargo
The Soviet Union was the nation called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (the USSR) that had consisted of about 15 separate nation states such as Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Belorussia, Ukraine and others. It was a single nation. The Soviet bloc was a group of nations who allied themselves with the Soviet Union because their political nature was similar to that of the Soviet Union. Such nations were Bulgaria, East Germany, Czechoslovakia and others. It was not a single nation but a group of individual nations.
A state is a political entity. A nation is a cultural group. Many nations--like the Germans--have a state. Some nations--like the Kurds or the Palestinians---do not. Because most states today are nation-states, we are inclined to think that a nation=a state, but this is simply carelessness.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is not a nation but a group of nations grouped together into a sovereign state. The four nations of this state are, Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
yep..my group bro..justified..go to fb and youll see us..