American opponents of the League of Nations concentrated on Article X because it committed member nations to defend each other against aggression, potentially dragging the U.S. into foreign conflicts without Congressional approval. Critics, including isolationists, feared that this obligation would undermine U.S. sovereignty and entangle the nation in European wars. They argued that it could lead to an endless cycle of military interventions, infringing on the nation's ability to independently determine its foreign policy. This concern ultimately contributed to the Senate's rejection of the League.
been willing to compromise with League opponents in Congress
Article 6
The author of this article works for the United Nations.
Some opponents objected to American interference in other nations affairs. Others argued that the United States could not afford to carry on a global crusade against cmmunism.
it was an article that promised peace between nations worldwide
It impressed other nations with american power.
This article declares that when the need arises, member nations will engage in collective defense to help ally nations. It has only been implemented once and that was during 9/11.
Yes. I refer you to this article: http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=article&cat=OtherOpinions&article=2032
Union of South American Nations was created in 2008.
it limited united states sovereignty
Truman Doctrine
dictators governed latin american nations after independence