Yes, an ecosystem can have multiple tertiary consumers. These organisms, which are typically carnivores that eat secondary consumers, can occupy similar ecological niches but may prey on different species or compete for the same prey. The presence of multiple tertiary consumers can enhance biodiversity and contribute to the stability of the ecosystem. However, the specific number and types of tertiary consumers depend on the ecosystem's structure and available resources.
The biomass of a tertiary consumer would be smaller than the biomass of a primary consumer. This is because energy is lost as it moves up the food chain through each trophic level. Tertiary consumers have less available energy and biomass compared to primary consumers.
Why are there fewer top level consumers than lower level consumers
If you mean that can tertiary and quaternary consumers both be carnivores, then yes, they can be. The quaternary consumers are probably at the top of the food chain as there are rarely any more than 4 - 5 trophic levels. This is because it would be pointless as there would be very little energy left for the top consumer.If you actually mean what you said literally in the question then the top consumer can eat carnivores but it is highly unlikely that the tertiary consumer will eat carnivores - they usually eat omnivores (secondary consumers) who eat herbivores (primary consumers) who eat producers (e.g. plants).
If a primary consumer was removed from an ecosystem the secondary consumer would more than likely adapt to survive. History has shown us that some species are better than others at adapting and the more versatile a species is, the longer they survive. Now more species than ever are in danger because of their natural habitat being destroyed, but on the positive side there are many more convenience stores open now which will give them a fighting chance.
secondary consumer because the grass hopper eats grass than the bird eats it the grass is the producer the grass hopper is the primary consumer then the bird is the secondary. the thing that eats the bird would be the tertiary consumer.
because the producers can utilize all the energy they make for themselves while consumers can only harvest what is left after each tropic.
Tertiary alkyl halides are more reactive than primary alkyl halides because the carbon in a tertiary alkyl halide is more substitued and more stable due to hyperconjugation and steric hindrance. This makes the C-X bond weaker in tertiary alkyl halides, making them more reactive towards nucleophilic substitution reactions.
.
In a healthy habitat, there are typically more producers than tertiary consumers. Producers, such as plants and phytoplankton, form the base of the food web and are abundant, providing energy for the entire ecosystem. Tertiary consumers, which are higher-level predators, are fewer in number as they rely on a larger biomass of primary and secondary consumers for sustenance. This pyramid structure of energy distribution supports a greater number of producers compared to higher trophic levels.
They help the ecosystem and contribute to it and they help they ecosystem.
there will be no ecosystem
Yes, when their diet varies they can fill more than one trophic level