Fungicides kill beneficial fungi that attack or compete with fungi that infect plants. Pesticides kill parasitoid wasps that control insect pests at low population densities, beforethey get out of hand, as well as predatory insects that help control pests when they do get out of hand. Chemicals reduce the biodiversity that organic farmers rely on to control pests and cycle nutrients in the soil.
Inorganic farming is also extremely energy intensive. Petroleum is a feed stock in almost all agricultural chemicals. Whenever the price of oil goes up, the prices of agricultural chemicals, and the foods produced using them, also rise.
Answer # 2The above answer, while not patently false, is misleading in that the author assumes that all non-organic (i.e. commercial) farms use all of the methods described all of the time and that the general statements given apply to all of the materials listed. For example, many insecticides now being used are not intended to completely eradicate the targeted pest, only to suppress it to an economically acceptable threshold. Farmers who use fungicides know very well that they cannot absolutely eradicate any detrimental fungus, nor should they try, because of pesticide resistance issues.The phrase "pesticides to control insect pests" is also interesting in that it displays a lack of education as to exactly what constitutes a pesticide. Organic producers use pesticides, too, just ones approved for organic production. Modern commercial agriculture may well be petroleum-dependant, but not nearly to the degree implied.
Organic producers should be commended for the hard work they put into their crops, and provide a valuable alternative. In time, commercial agriculture will most probably eventually move in this direction, just as modern corn, soybean, and wheat farmers are finding that no-till farming provides some very real benefits; they just have to learn new techniques.
There is no such thing as "inorganic" farming. There's farming, then there's organic farming.
organic farming
Both
This question cannot be answered due to its self-contradictory nature. "Farming" is the growing of plants or animals, and "inorganic" means non-living. You can't grow something that is not alive.
This question cannot be answered because the phrase "inorganic farming" is self-contradictory.inorganic --Not arising from natural growth.Of, relating to, or denoting compounds that are not organic (broadly, compounds not containing carbon).farming --The activity or business of growing crops and raising livestock.In other words, if it is inorganic, it can't be farmed because it won't grow.
They were bad at farming.
Farming is bad
Well, let's look at it this way, friend. Inorganic farming can provide higher yields and faster growth due to the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. However, it may harm the environment by depleting soil health and polluting water sources. Remember, every method has its pros and cons, and it's all about finding a balance that works best for both the land and the people.
bad
Bad farming practices means practices that are harmful to the land or the environment. This includes using harmful pesticides and fertilizers.
Typically farmers choose inorganic or conventional farming because 1) that is what they are accustomed to, and 2) cost efficiency. To be considered organic not only do you have to practice organic farming but you also have to buy a permit or license that costs quiet a bit of money. Also man made pesticides are much cheaper than the organic alternatives. Many farms are passed along through generations and have been taught by their parents or grandparents. This makes changing the identity or practices of your farm difficult because this is the way you were taught and how it has always been.
No. There are many inorganic nutrients that we abolutely need. Magnesium, Calcium, Selenium, Chromium, all come to mind. There are many more....