no
A controlled experiment is one in which a control group is closely monitored. In this way, the experiment can be much more accurate as more factors are accounted for.
A controlled experiment is better than a none controlled experiment because you can control one of them and the other you can't. Science is a really fun subject.
A control is needed in a valid experiment because without controls then more then one variable is being tested. This can mess up the results.
Yes, an experiment can have more than one hypothesis. Multiple hypotheses allow researchers to explore different potential explanations for a phenomenon. Each hypothesis can be tested separately in the experiment to determine which one is supported by the evidence.
Yes, having more than one control group in an experiment can enhance the validity of the results. Multiple control groups allow researchers to compare the effects of different variables or conditions, helping to isolate the specific impact of the treatment being tested. This approach can also account for confounding factors and improve the overall robustness of the findings. However, it is essential to ensure that the design remains manageable and interpretable.
It really depends on what the experiment is.
Yes you can, but the more variables you have the more complex the problem becomes.
Gives you a more correct method of predicting which is the right one.
The outcome of the experiment may not be linked to any one specific variable.
yes it can I've done a few experiments that have had more than one independant variable.
The control of an experiment is one in which the independent variable is not manipulated. It is used as a comparison for all other aspects in the experiment.
If you test only one variable then you know that the difference in the experimental and control setup is that one independent variable. If you test more than one you will not know which one made the difference.