A panel of three arbitrators decide a dispute after hearing the arguments from both sides. Arbitration is different from adjudication through the court system because of several reasons 1. There is no appeal. Judgment is final. 2. Each party chooses one arbitrator and the third is chosen by the two arbitrators chosen by the parties. 3. Unlike the court system where the courthouse, and the judge and his/her staff is supported by taxpayers the entire arbitration (building, wages of arbitrators and support staff, everything) is paid for by the parties. With that said the entire arbitration process usually cost less than adjudication. This is due to #1; no appeals. 4. The cost for the three arbitrators can cost $10,000/day. Arbitrators charge more than attorneys. (So, 10,000 divided by 3 = $3,333 per arbitrator per day. But they do not work every day.) Civil Procedure by Yeazell 7th ed. pg 505-06
why does the location matter tho -.-
The final decision of an arbitrator is called a ruling. The final decision of an arbitrator is called an award.
An Arbitrator
An arbitrement is a judgment of an arbitrator - an arbitraiton.
Management and labor must approve the arbitrator.
The Arbitrator - 1904 was released on: USA: January 1904
An arbitrator is a man or woman voluntarily selected by both parties in a conflict to give a binding verdict in a case. It is a form of settlement out of court. An arbitrator can be any person that both parties trust to make a fair judgement. He or she doesn't have to be a lawyer.
An arbitrator is a third party who hears both sides of an argument and then makes an impartial decision. The decision announced by an arbitrator is often as binding as if it was announced by a judge.
Decision of the arbitrator
Decision of the Arbitrator
An arbitrator makes a decision for the parties involved in a dispute, which is usually binding. A mediator helps the parties communicate and reach a mutually agreed upon solution, but does not make a decision for them.
An arbitrator's decision and award can typically be appealed to the courts only in limited circumstances, such as if there was misconduct or bias on the part of the arbitrator, or if the decision violates public policy.