An arbitrator's decision and award can typically be appealed to the courts only in limited circumstances, such as if there was misconduct or bias on the part of the arbitrator, or if the decision violates public policy.
The decision rendered by a private arbitrator is "99.9 %" binding and neither party can appeal the result. Even "an error of law apparent on the face of the [decision] that causes substantial injustice does not provide grounds for [an appeal]." California Supreme Court in the Moncharsh decision (1992). In other words, if the arbitrator adds 2 + 2 and says that totals 5, too bad, his or her decision cannot be appealed to the courts to correct the error. Added: The above answer may be true and applicable in California, but it is not the prevailing rule in all states. Judgements made by lesser judicial officers, arbitrators, magistrates, justices of the peace, etc, are subject to the review and over-rule by a judge of the appropriate court. If the arbitrator (et al) makes an error that is not caught by the judge, the aribitrator's ruling may be appealed and possibly overturned by higher judicial authority.
No. Only the courts can award legal custody.
A monetary award for damages.
Only the courts can award guardianship.
The final decision of an arbitrator is called a ruling. The final decision of an arbitrator is called an award.
Of course not. The temporary guardian had to be appointed by the court and only the court can appoint another guardian. Only courts can appoint guardians or award custody.Of course not. The temporary guardian had to be appointed by the court and only the court can appoint another guardian. Only courts can appoint guardians or award custody.Of course not. The temporary guardian had to be appointed by the court and only the court can appoint another guardian. Only courts can appoint guardians or award custody.Of course not. The temporary guardian had to be appointed by the court and only the court can appoint another guardian. Only courts can appoint guardians or award custody.
You need to add more details. Courts award custody that is in the best interest of the child.
Disciplinary action does not automatically disqualify an employee from receiving an award. The decision to award or disqualify an employee would typically depend on the specific circumstances surrounding the disciplinary action and the criteria for the award. However, disciplinary action may be a factor considered by the awarding entity in making their decision.
The award really depends on the facts in the case and your situation. The award can be arranged as a settlement by your attorney or the case can go to trial where a Jury of peers would make the decision.
Verdict (typically refers to a jury decision) or judgment(final decision of the court).
Yes the courts will award child support if the paternity test proves that he is the father. But that doesn't mean he will pay it.
An arbitrator is a person or some times an ad hoc (for the duration of the arbitration) body, who will evaluate a conflict or litigation by the versions presented by each side. The arbitrator will then, after careful analysis, issue a decision that most often is binding and obligatory, resolving and concluding the conflict or litigation. Arbitrators differ from mediators in that a mediator has the purpose to make the sides agree on middle terms while an arbitrator does not strive for the agreement between the parties but for a resolution of the conflict in a fair manner and according to justice. Most often, conflicts and litigations may first be submitted to a mediator and only if the mediation fails, the problem will be submitted to an arbitrator. An example of arbitrators, are judges, but in international relations as well as in commercial and private issues, arbitrators may be appointed who usually have background and are graduated in law and have or are assisted by someone having experience in interpersonal psychology.